THE COST OF RECOVERING THE POWER SYSTEM AND ACCELERATING THE CAPACITY EXPANSION PROGRAMME DOMINATES ESKOM'S RESULTS
Johannesburg, Thursday, 27 August 2009: The year under review has been primarily about keeping the lights burning and recovering the power system. For the first part of the year, Eskom undertook extra-ordinary measures to recover the power system following the events of 24 January 2008.
"The extraordinary measures have come at a cost to Eskom's bottom line. This, however, has resulted in an improvement in the health of the country's power system and an increased resilience on the part of Eskom", says Eskom's Chief Executive Mr Jacob Maroga.
The operating loss for the year for the Eskom group, before the impact of embedded derivatives and net finance costs, is R3 195 million (2008: profit of R3 215 million). The impact of the embedded derivatives on the balance sheet and sensitivity to the assumptions has been significant. At 31 March 2009, the net embedded derivative asset amounted to R1 266 million (2008: R7 696 million) and the embedded derivatives liability amounted to R8 260 million (2008: R5 084 million). The net impact, in the income statement, of the changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives for the group is R9 514 million (2008: R1680 million). The fair value loss is mainly due to the sharp decrease in the aluminium price as at March 2009 compared to 31 March 2008, the annual electricity price increase used to value the derivatives and the lower South African interest rate curve as at 31 March 2009 compared to 31 March 2008.
The sales of electricity decreased by 4,2% (2008: increase of 2,9%). Eskom saw a 2% drop in demand from the start of 2008 until September 2008. This was mainly in response to the call made to industrial and residential users to reduce their energy consumption. Later, and as a result of the international economic and financial developments, the steel industry followed by the ferro-alloys sector started reducing production mainly due to a reduction in the global demand.
At the start of the year, coal stock levels were well below the required minimum of 20 days. The target coal stock levels were increased to an average of 42 days. While Eskom purchased 132, 66 M tons (2008: 119, 63 M tons), the total coal burn for the year under review was 121,16 M tons (2008: 125,30 M tons) . Given that the long-term contracted coal suppliers could not respond to the short-term increase in our coal requirements, additional coal was purchased mainly through more expensive short-term coal contracts which included coal transportation costs.