FEATURES

"The unbearable whiteness of being"

Dave Steward*
09 September 2008

Dave Steward on the one-sided view of history being depicted in the Apartheid Museum

In a recent article on the alienation of Afrikaner youth, Prof Jonathan Jansen, the black former Dean of Education at the University of Pretoria, wrote that the only way that "racist sentiment could be overcome was if we stopped reinforcing the idea black was good and white was bad, and to recognize each other as human beings." He then asked "Can you imagine what it is like walking through the Apartheid Museum as a white child? To have the knowledge of what your fathers did - it's the unbearable whiteness of being."

I thought that I would visit the Apartheid Museum - to see for myself whether I would also experience this ‘unbearable whiteness of being'. After all, I was one of the ‘fathers' to whom Jansen referred: for the whole of my career I served the government that instituted apartheid; then tortuously tried to reform it, and finally - thank God - abolished it.

It was a wrenching experience. The museum graphically conveys the awful alienation caused by apartheid. One enters through prison-like portals marked ‘nie-blankes' and ‘blankes' - and is then confronted with giant racial ID cards in heavy wire cages. Inside everything is stark: naked brick and steel bars.

One is led up a ramp depicting the first violent contact between whites and San hunters (nothing about similar clashes between the San and migrating black tribes).

There is a large black and white photo of the devastation wrought to Boer farms during the Anglo-Boer War - (but, strangely enough, nothing of the 26 000 women and children who died in the concentration camps).

The general impression of our history is of the depredations wrought by white colonialists that disrupted the peace-loving heirs of the ‘glittering' civilization of Mapungubwe (I saw nothing about the wars of Mfecane). There is a temporary exhibition on the life of Steve Biko (clearly a remarkable man) - and the callous reaction of Jimmy Kruger, to his death in police custody.

The museum makes effective use of TV monitors with repeating films containing statements by Hendrik Verwoerd, sweetly explaining how much blacks benefited from apartheid; PW Botha, wagging his finger; and Paul Sauer, referring to most blacks as 'barbarians'.

There is a flickering film produced during the 30s to depict Afrikaner history - showing happy Malay slaves, the Great Trek and the massacre of Piet Retief. A panel on education highlights the early-50s quote by Verwoerd that blacks should not be educated beyond a certain level (but there is no explanation why there were more black tertiary students than whites by 1989).

Everywhere there are images of unrelenting black poverty and repression (but nothing about the fact that the gap between white and black incomes had been closing by 10% each decade since 1970).

All the material is carefully selected to reinforce the points that the Museum has set out to make. One walks through a gallows chamber with hundreds of hangman's ropes depicting those executed under apartheid - juxtaposed nearby with a continuous video of Barbie-doll white children attending church.

There is a panel illustrating the allegedly hateful relations between white families and their black domestics (Gosh, did dear old Sally who for decades was part of my parents' family, really hate them?) and a giant photo of dehumanized naked, black mineworkers undergoing a medical examination.

Due homage is paid to ‘good' whites who supported the struggle - the Braam Fischers, Neil Aggetts and Ruth Firsts - to avoid any accusation that the exhibition is in any way anti-white. But there is nothing about the contribution that the ‘bad' whites made to the development of the country; very little about the factors that motivated successive generations of white voters; and hardly anything about the global context within which all of this took place.

Perhaps the most riveting part of the exhibition is a 20-minute large screen film of the unrest of the 1980s. It includes many of the images of the turmoil that we have now largely forgotten; riot police chasing protesters over barbed wire fences; soldiers firing tear-gas from Caspirs; undulating seas of chanting and toy-toying demonstrators.

Young black veterans of the struggle explain with almost religious zeal the necessity of ‘necklacing' informers. The film ends with the claim that it was all this that forced the apartheid government to the negotiating table (there is no possibility that there might have been any worthy motive).

After that it all changes. F W de Klerk is given credit for his role in the process and Roelf Meyer boyishly explains how the transition liberated whites as well.

Then one emerges into the brilliant sunlight of a highveld winter day, onto a plaza dominated by giant pillars representing the values in our Constitution - including one proclaiming ‘reconciliation'.

One wonders what emotions are stirred in the busload after busload of black school children who pass wide-eyed through the museum (perhaps someone should do research) - or in Prof Jansen's angry young Afrikaners.

It is a genuinely moving experience - in the same way that a Palestinian museum on the history of the State of Israel might be. But it has nothing to do with objectivity or reconciliation.

It has everything to do with perpetuating racial stereotypes and entrenching perceptions of racial guilt. In multicultural societies that can be a recipe for disaster.

*Dave Steward is the Executive Director of the FW de Klerk Foundation

Click here to receive the Politicsweb headlines in your inbox every morning

Services

Subscribe to newsletters
News feeds


Share this article

Facebook Facebook Google Google Laaik.it Laaik.it
Yahoo! Yahoo! Digg Digg del.icio.us del.icio.us


 

Comments

If you come across comments that are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate; contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs, please report them and they will be removed.
 
 responses to this article

APARTHEID MUSEUM IS JUST TOWING OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT LINE
It seems Mbeki's divide and rule policy has been adopted in this museum. Thanks to this policy, this country has never been more racially divided. Gone is the goodwill built up by Mandela. A real sorry state of affairs.

by WTF on September 09 2008, 06:32
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

History gone mad.
Unfortunately it is now all too clear that the Afrikaners and others were not altogether wrong in viewing blacks as inferior beings. Where they went wrong, though, was in treating them as such. No doubt in time to come, when the pendulum's swung, . .more

by Darwon on September 09 2008, 07:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Mbeki and company
practice their own special form of racism here, I am sure one day there will be a museum to all the thousands of people killed here during their reign.

by Abacus on September 09 2008, 07:47
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

If I recall the museum was built as part of a social investment project
so that Gold Reef city could get a gambling license. The casinos are now full of poor black people hoping for a miracle. If that's not cynical then I dont know what is.

by A.Ryan on September 09 2008, 07:58
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Museum for the AIDS victims
Mbeki's denialism has killed millions. No museum to commemorate that one is there?

by pfp on September 09 2008, 08:00
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Julius of the ANCYL
It sounds like Julius and his dumber cousin were the directors of the film there - Julius will KILL for ZUMA - what a brainless buffoon, being groomed as future ANC leader - he has done more damage to the image of the ANC in 6 months than all the . .more

by Lovemore Mabandla on September 09 2008, 08:11
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Nothing strange about this museum,
we all know that one racist government was exchanged for another.

by cooldog on September 09 2008, 08:23
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Hang on a seccy
Is this the same Dave Steward who spewed forth National Party propaganda on SABC during apartheid?

Even if it is, the worrying thing is that his observations are true: One doesn't see the carnage that ANC cowards perpetrated by planting limpet . .more

by Dave on September 09 2008, 08:40
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Dave - this is sad. You are an apologist to the end
The next thing you are going to tell us is that "the blacks actually enjoyed carrying the dompas" as it helped them remember where they lived after visiting an illegal shebeen....

by Watcher on September 09 2008, 08:50
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

"apartheid not our fault"
"Yes, our forefathers did not create apartheid and were not racist. It was the government of day that made us live like that. We had no moral compass to assess right from wrong, actually we were told that GOD odained it such. We had domestics like Sally . .more

by sitting bull on September 09 2008, 08:57
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Convenient loss of memory
Lets look at some facts.If it was not for the Nats SA would probably be another Cuba as the ANC was trained and backed by the USSR.For most people all they know about Mandela, prior to his release in 1990, was that he had spent 27 years in prison and was . .more

by Hypocrites on September 09 2008, 09:00
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

It's truly sad
Just goes to show, politicians cannot really facilitate or manage transformation, they're mostly the same inside. Maybe the ordinary folks of this country should erect a museum where we can all see the real goodwill among people of all the different . .more

by Amazed on September 09 2008, 09:26
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

all-together now
de la rey, de la rey, de la rey, de la rey......aaaahhhhhhh.....feel much better now!!!

by Grave-digger on September 09 2008, 09:29
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

How stupid can they be!!!
My two white afrikaans little children has many black friends, they dont even realise that their friends are black and they are white--why? Because colour is not an issue, preference, yardstic etc in our house! Why would anybody want to take children to a . .more

by Witblitz on September 09 2008, 10:01
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

museum
Maybe Dave Steward has brought some political baggage from the past, but have we not all? Including the ANC indunas with all the atrocities committed by them against their own people? The ANC has no right to adopt a holier-than-thou attitude! They are . .more

by jaycee on September 09 2008, 10:22
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@watcher and @sitting bull
You've clearly (and perhaps deliberately) missed the point. Nowhere is it intimated that the oppressed enjoyed their oppression or that no one but the government of the day was responsible for what went on.

It is quite clearly stated that for . .more

by CTheB on September 09 2008, 10:22
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Face the facts
It's called the Apartheid Museum and consequently shows a history of the atrocities of Apartheid. It is not the Boer War museum, thats why there is no Afrikaner concentration camp displays.
Unfortunatley for white people, their history has some . .more

by Face the facts on September 09 2008, 10:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Who cares...
By now, whitey should have figured out that he/she isn't welcome any more in the "glorious" Azanian revolution. A silly addendum to a cheesy gambling palace doesn't mean much in the greater scheme of things...

by Zee on September 09 2008, 10:35
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Without racial tensions the ANC are just a useless African government
The ANC need to keep the memory of the struggle alive because without the glory days of their past they are just another African government doing a lousy job at running a country.

De Klerk and his government made the ultimate political sacrifice . .more

by Sad Days on September 09 2008, 10:42
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

to CtheB
If your "logic" is correct, then one can argue against the Holacast museum for example, as Germans living at the time, or their offspring would claim that it was biased too. Please accept it that apartheid was a "crime against humanity" and the museum is . .more

by JG on September 09 2008, 10:50
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Historic Objectivity
Since when has history been objective? All new governments rewrite history, telling what grips them about the past. When a new government comes into power, all the old statues, monuments and stories are dismantled and replaced to glorify the incumbents . .more

by Dreamer on September 09 2008, 10:55
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

History is told by the Victors
Need I say more......?

by Watcher on September 09 2008, 11:43
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

WWDBS- What would David Bullard Say
This is a nice one to copy

by Lord Ha Ha on September 09 2008, 11:43
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Witblitz: Pas op.
How warming to read that your little Afrikaans kiddies don't know the difference between black and white. I trust they do know the difference between pit bulls and Maltese poodles, though - or did you neglect to warn them about that danger too? Of . .more

by Darwon on September 09 2008, 12:06
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@JG: there is one big difference between the holocaust museum and this one
As Hypocrites above puts it, 518 blacks died under apartheid security forces, the rest was black on black violence. I would hazard a guess that of the 518, many were terrorists (whichever way you want to paint them) and sadly there were people like Biko . .more

by Dave on September 09 2008, 12:25
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Dave Steward dreaming,
Majority of whites supported and helped sustain apartheid.

Apartheid =whites abusing wokers
= Whites enjoying country resouces Africans left out
= Thousands of African killed by whites
Apartheid . .more

by Piet Van Bieltong on September 09 2008, 12:44
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Dompass
Please enlighten how long the Dompass was enforced? I bet you the last Dompass holder is now in his 90's.

For holocaust museums and this to act as a warning - not the same thing, for in Germany the young Jews don't afterwards come and visit the . .more

by Domkop on September 09 2008, 12:53
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Acknowledge complicity
Its such a damn shame that even in the face of overwhelming evidence,some white folks continue to deny that Apartheid existed, too bad the museum provides ample evidence,not to mention the enduring legacy.
The author of this article,tries to . .more

by BMZ on September 09 2008, 13:29
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Crying and sobbing brats SAfricans!
SA's have to be the most whingey people we have met. Constantly complaining, particularly when abroad about the service that does not match home......?! SA has had a difficult period in its existence, but then so have dozens of other countries. Blacks, . .more

by Lionel on September 09 2008, 13:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

APARTHEID
I will kill for apartheid to return

by et tu julius on September 09 2008, 13:53
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Its such a damn shame that even in the face of overwhelming evidence
Quick question.

Evidence - is the witness telling the truth or is the witness telling lies with prefabricated evidence? The museum I claim is tampering with the evidence.

"and despite deliberate underfunding by the racist . .more

by Domkop on September 09 2008, 15:23
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@ all of You
Clearly none of you clowns should be making any comments about apartheid. I saw nearly half my school being wiped out in Kwa-Mashu in the late eighties. Oh did I mention this was a Primary School. There were bodies everywhere. I was 12years old at the . .more

by darkchild on September 09 2008, 15:56
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

English persuit of world dominance
What makes my blood boil is you still have the audaisty to call us savages and barbarians. Who killed all the aborigines in Australia, all the American Indians (North and South American)

King Edward even wanted to kill all the Scots who . .more

by darkchild on September 09 2008, 16:10
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Yeah yeah yeah darkchild ...
Spewing unsubstantiated chop again - Now try another one you brainless moron

by Piper on September 09 2008, 16:11
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@darkchild
Savages and barbarians? Never has that thought ever entered the mind of a peaceful eductaed civilised person darkchild, promise. Never ever.

by Tony Blare on September 09 2008, 16:50
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

botha vs Idi amin
Who was a worse dictator - Botha or Idi Amin ? who has done more harm to the people of SA - the current health minister, or all of the NAT presidents put together ??

by Lovemore Mabandla on September 09 2008, 17:11
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Hau, darkchild
Hau darkchild you is talking K** man. Hamba here you little snotnose. Voetsek!

by Haibo on September 09 2008, 17:11
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Hospitals
Actually public hospitals were in batter shape 15 years ago under botha than they are today under Mbeki and Manto - FACT !

by Lovemore Mabandla on September 09 2008, 17:12
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Darkchild
You conveniently forget about the African leaders who commited the most horiffic crimes (e.g. Idi Amin, Mugabe, Charles Taylor, Joseph Kony, Théoneste Bagosora etc etc.). Calling these men savages is too good for them.

by Blake on September 09 2008, 23:06
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

What has happened..
...to the Jewel of Africa, created by the euro settlers?
SA had: The finest infrastructure in Africa; roads, telecoms, water, power, sewage, railways. What has happened to this? Run into the ground by black incompetence and greed. For 6-7 years after . .more

by Jack on September 10 2008, 00:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Peace, Love and respect....
Okay, I was being a bit dramatic and I must admit some of my comments are out of line. The point is we all have skeletons. Lets us focus on building and shaping a better future in stead of discussing issues like apartheid. We all know its a depressing . .more

by darkchild on September 10 2008, 06:49
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

darkchild: you still don't get it.
500-year old skeletons are one thing; savagery and barbarity in the 21st century altogether another.

by Multimode on September 10 2008, 06:57
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Police came from out of the blue and just started shooting at anything. THESE WERE KIDS FOR CHRISTS ...
Well a std 5 is too dumb to understand bigger politics and the reason why they started shooting. Maybe your mates were busy burning down the school and disassembling it brick by brick, window frame by window frame. The police will still have the records. . .more

by Domkop on September 10 2008, 08:22
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Have any of you been to the AM.
I have and I took my teenager to see it. I felt it was my duty to put some balance and perspective on our history. The victors penn the history and the pendulum always swings too far. So whether you were subjected to countless years of "groot trek" . .more

by and Zen on September 10 2008, 10:36
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

The Apartheid Museum . . . the true story
This South African Heritage Day (24 September) marks ten years to the day when The Apartheid Museum began nationwide distribution of a concept document that anticipated broad South African participation in the erection of a R1Billion structure called The . .more

by Arnold on September 24 2008, 18:03
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Name
Subject
Comment