Thabo Mbeki welcomes SCA findings
Following careful consideration of Monday's Judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in the matter between the National Director of Public Prosecutions and African National Congress President, Mr Jacob Zuma, former President Thabo Mbeki wishes to make the following observations:
1. I welcome and accept the determinations made by the SCA that Judge Nicholson had no facts before him to suggest that I and the Cabinet interfered with the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) in its consideration of matters relating to Mr Jacob Zuma.
2. In my Address to the Nation on September 21, 2008, I said: "I would like to restate the position of Cabinet on the inferences made by the Honourable Judge Chris Nicholson that the President and Cabinet have interfered in the work of the National Prosecuting Authority. Again I would like to state this categorically that we have never done this...In this context it is most unfortunate that gratuitous suggestions have been made seeking to impugn the integrity of those of us who have been privileged to serve in our country's National Executive."
3. I agree with the SCA where it says Judge Nicholson made "gratuitous findings against persons who were not called upon to defend themselves...(failed) to distinguish between allegation, fact and suspicion, and ...(transgressed) the proper boundaries between judicial, executive and legislative functions."
4. Accordingly, I also agree with the SCA where it says, "Most of the allegations (of political interference) were not only irrelevant but they were gratuitous and based on suspicion and not on fact."
5. I also agree with the SCA where it says, "Once again, the 'strategy' involving Dr Maduna, Mr Mbeki and all the other members of cabinet as well as the causal connection between the Ngcuka decision and Mr Mbeki and the cabinet as found by the trial judge were not based on any evidence or allegation. They were instead part of the judge's own conspiracy theory and not one advanced by Mr Zuma."
6. Like the SCA, we had found the manner by which Judge Nicholson made negative findings against the President and the Cabinet "incomprehensible".
7. We intervened in the NPA appeal to the SCA because we wanted to correct the unfair and unwarranted inferences made by Judge Nicholson against us, and as the SCA said, we "had ample reason to be upset by the reasons in the judgement which cast aspersions on (us) without regard to (our) basic rights to be treated fairly." The SCA ruling has vindicated us.
8. It seems to me that the unacceptable practice of propagation of deliberate falsehoods to attain various objectives is becoming entrenched in our country. I am pleased that the SCA has provided firm leadership in this regard by insisting that nobody's integrity should be impugned on the basis of untested allegations.
9. All of us as leaders and citizens have the responsibility critically to reflect on this practice in order to avoid the entrenchment of a culture which may eventually corrupt our society.
Issued by the Office of Thabo Mbeki, January 13 2009
Services
|
||||||||||








Comments
What the SCA judgement *really* says is that, by appointing judges with more activist zeal than integrity or judicial competence, Mbeki set in place an insidious process of undermining the organs of state and Zimbabwefication.
The fact that this bit . .more
by Fleabite on January 13 2009, 20:00
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Usually, when a company recalls product there is an implied if not outright confession that the prodct was faulty, unsafe, unhealthy, toxic, or damaging to the consumer's happiness. product recalls are usually accompanied by bountiful offers of cashback . .more
by Plutarch on January 13 2009, 21:20
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
A true son of the soil with his mistake of coz ,(zim and his stupid HIV drive being the 2 outstanding) and am of the view that credit ought to be given where its due.His tenure had lots of good things happening for us all.internationally he represented us . .more
by reggy on January 14 2009, 07:45
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
The SCA only said that the question of Mbeki's meddling was not before the court. Meddling with the judiciary was part of the ANC culture under Mbeki - look at the timing of Winnie's testimony before the TRC just before the ANC year-end congress. . .more
by Jan on January 14 2009, 08:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Your "mistake list" should be much longer. Mbeki is a racist and never truly had the interests of all South Afircans at heart. His appointments of incompetent cadres is an example of this.
by AP on January 14 2009, 09:12
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
i don't know where you coming from with such views, look at yourself in the mirror an the tells us that the wasn't a banch of incompetent **..... back then,
by RR on January 14 2009, 11:29
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Zimbabwe total collapse, 200 000 AIDS patients allowed to die who could have been saved, Police force corruption and calling for death to all white dogs, Corrupt police chief whom he protected, Killing of the scorpions, Protecting under performing . .more
by JFK on January 14 2009, 11:32
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
It is extremely unlikely tha Mbeki has no knowledge of the fraud that was commited in the arms deal.
He just has not got the integrity to split on his comrades from the liberation struggle.
The ANC is such a stereotyped, predictable . .more
by j on January 14 2009, 11:39
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Eish, hau!!! Kindly decipher your response. You must be one of those cadres!!
by AP on January 14 2009, 15:54
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it