FEATURES

Julius Malema replies to Jeremy Cronin

Julius Malema
19 November 2009

ANCYL president says SACP article on mine nationalisation was openly reactionary

The opinion article by Cde Jeremy Cronin, a renowned analyst and poet is openly reactionary, clothed in quasi-Marxist rhetoric, with potential to make a sorry and sad reflection of the true character of the South African Communist Party's ideological steadfastness. What is worrying though is that Cde Cronin's anti development and counter progress sentiments are projected as views of South African Communist Party (see article).

It is highly unlikely that Cde Cronin represents the views and true character of the Communist Party because the Communist Party we know is one that was able to mould Nelson Mandela from an anti-communist radical into a true revolutionary who did not only embrace the Freedom Charter, but was willing to take up arms to defend it.

Communist Party activists played an important role in the ideological, political and organisational configuration of the ANC Youth League in the early 1940s and early 1950s, despite the hostility they encountered from the Youth Leaguers, particularly Nelson Mandela. When Nelson Mandela rebuked the Communist Party and physically disrupted its meetings, it was the longest serving General Secretary of the Communist Party, Moses Kotane who paid particular attention to the ready to fight anti-communist militant (Mandela) and transformed him into fighting nationalist revolutionary against the white bourgeoisie and the British imperialists.

William Nkomo, Walter Sisulu, Oliver Tambo, Joe Matthews and many of our predecessors in the Youth League matured within the revolutionary national liberation movement to accept the ideological guidance from the Communist Party. Practical joint programmes of what is now understood to be the alliance between the ANC and the Communist Party were pioneered by the founding generation of the ANC YL amidst condemnation by the Senior and older leadership of the ANC.

These realities about the Communist Party and many others make us to earnestly believe that Jeremy Cronin could not be writing about the ANC YL's call for the Nationalisation of Mines in the manner he did if he truly represents the Communist Party. But because Jeremy Cronin chose to write about the Nationalisation of Mines in response to the ANC YL, we are left with no choice but to respond and expose the reactionary undertones that characterise his input.

It is very sad that Jeremy Cronin decided to isolate me from the ANC YL 23rd National Congress resolution that "the State should be custodian of the people in its ownership, extraction, production and trade of mineral wealth beneath the soil, monopoly industries and banks". We thought that it is only rightwing Newspapers and their attendant analysts who recurrently isolate me from the organisation, and indeed amazed that Jeremy Cronin has joined the band.

Socialisation vs. Nationalisation

Cde Jeremy Cronin takes issue with the fact that the ANC YL has called for Nationalisation of Mines, instead of socialisation. He says "this is why the SACP also prefers in general to refer to "socialisation" rather than "nationalisation". This is quite odd because in the same opinion article, Cde Cronin re-asserts the Communist Party's call for the Nationalisation of SASOL.

The SACP 12th National Congress resolved amongst other things, "to campaign for and ensure the re-nationalization of companies in strategic sectors such SASOL and Mittal Steel with an ultimate aim of nationalizing and socializing the commanding heights of the economy in line with the vision of the Freedom Charter". It appears from this resolution and many others that contrary to what Cde Jeremy says, the SOUTH AFRICAN Communist Party has never preferred socialisation as opposed to nationalisation, and neither did it narrowly prefer nationalisation as opposed to socialisation.

In August 2009, the ANC YL released a Nationalisation of Mines conceptual framework (see here) on what our understanding of Nationalisation is, so as to avoid the confusion and misinterpretations that seem to dominate Cronin's input. In the conceptual framework, we amongst other things said, "Nationalisation is not a panacea for South Africa's developmental challenges, but it should in the manner we are proposing it, entail democratising the commanding heights of the economy, to ensure they are not just legally owned by the state, but that they are thoroughly democratised and controlled by the people".

What is vital and important in the immediate is that Nationalisation of Mines should happen and the question, methods and approach of socialisation is directly consequent of the decision to Nationalise. Comrade Jeremy does not appreciate such, he instead philosophises the entire question so that he can reach reactionary conclusions.

In the ANC, "transfer of mineral wealth beneath the soil, monopoly industries and banks to the ownership of the people as a whole" was correctly understood as nationalisation if the government that nationalises can justly claim authority and based on the will of the people.

In the aftermath of the ANC's adoption of the Freedom Charter, the leadership of the ANC recurrently affirmed "transfer of ownership to the people as a whole" as amounting to a legitimate government's control and ownership of the commanding heights of the economy. Various evidence points to the fact that ownership by the people as a whole was construed to be meaning Nationalisation. Cde Jeremy Cronin is the one speaking English, not politics, and does not even provide a conceptual foundation of what is meant by socialisation.

Responding to a critique of the Freedom Charter by a Jordan K. Ngubane, who was against the economic clause of the Freedom Charter, President Albert Luthuli said in June 1956 that, "In modern society, even amongst the so-called capitalistic countries, nationalisation of certain industries and commercial undertakings has become an accepted and established fact. Only the uninitiated and ignorant would suggest that the Union of South Africa is going to Moscow because its Railways, Broadcasting and Post Office services are nationalised".

President Luthuli further illustrated that nationalisation as called for in South Africa and in the Freedom Charter did not amount to the Moscow style command economy, and this point is categorically stated in the July 2009 ANC YL's conceptual basis on nationalisation.

Again in 1956, a leader of the ANC, Nelson Mandela said, "It is true that in demanding the nationalisation of the banks, the gold mines and the land the Charter strikes a fatal blow at the financial and gold-mining monopolies and farming interests that have for centuries plundered the country and condemned its people to servitude. But such a step is absolutely imperative and necessary because the realisation of the Charter is inconceivable, in fact impossible, unless and until these monopolies are first smashed up and the national wealth of the country turned over to the people". There is absolutely no confusion on the understanding the leadership of the ANC had on the Freedom Charter, and the contemporary interpretations should not confuse us.

Former ANC President Oliver Tambo said in the 1969 political report to the National Consultative Conference in Morogoro that, "At the moment there are vast monopolies whose existence affects the livelihood of large numbers of our people and whose ownership is in the hands of Europeans only. It is necessary for monopolies which vitally affect the social well-being of our people such as the mines, the sugar and wine industry to be transferred to public ownership so that they can be used to uplift the life of all the people".

In his first public address after release from prison, former President Nelson Mandela said, "nationalisation of the mines, banks and monopoly industry is the policy of the ANC and a change or modification of our view in this regard is inconceivable". Oliver Tambo, Walter Sisulu, Chief Albert Luthuli and Nelson Mandela played critical role in the consultation for the Freedom Charter and adoption by the ANC, and they could not be mistaken.

Beneficiation of Minerals

Again, Comrade Jeremy deliberately provides incomplete information about the Minerals that are beneficiated in South Africa, clearly with the hope that we will not have information to disapprove him. Indeed COAL is used for electricity generation; SASOL uses certain Minerals to produce oil and the Aluminium Smelters smelt Aluminium. The Mineral Wealth in South Africa that is not beneficiated locally far exceeds the ones that are beneficiated in ESKOM, SASOL and the Aluminium Smelters.

South Africa is home to vital minerals reserves in the world, and this includes Platinum Group Metals (70%), Gold (40%), Manganese (70%), Chromium (70%) and 54 other minerals. What exactly happens to these Minerals is not known, yet Comrade Jeremy knowingly avoids this question because his main interest is centred on protecting and defending the existent property relations. The only thing we can do, as he suggests, is to transform the pattern of capital accumulation, not change it. We will never say that Comrade Jeremy is reformist because the Youth League will be considered as and labelled BEE funded anti-communist, only obsessed with shiny objects.

We said before that, "Our call for nationalisation is based on the Freedom Charter, but also on the fact that such will enhance and harness the State's capacity to create jobs and open economic opportunities for majority of our people. The State control, ownership and expansion of our mineral processing and beneficiation will play a critical role in labour-absorption of many other workers into the South African economy. Buttressed by a comprehensive social security strategy and industrial policy, South Africa needs high labour-intensive programmes to decisively deal with the unemployment and poverty challenges".

This call in Comrade Jeremy's books is reduced to the ANC YL's obsession with bling to the extent that we can never think anything developmental, but bling. It is sad that previously, those who look like us were considered intellectually inferior by the white supremacists, and today Comrade Jeremy reflects the same sentiment, even before he interacts with the views of the ANC YL.

The ANC's 52nd National Conference resolutions re-affirm that "the use of natural resources of which the state is the custodian on behalf of the people, including our minerals, water, marine resources in a manner that promotes the sustainability and development of local communities and also realises the economic and social needs of the whole nation".

This requires resolute leadership and decisive intervention into South Africa strategic economic sectors. There are lots of industrial beneficiation programmes South Africa can initiate and/or cause to happen despite jewellery. We are very aware that value can be added to Minerals not through jewellery only, but through various labour absorptive and developmental programmes.

The ANC YL said in August 2009 that "One of South Africa's greatest challenges is its high levels of unemployment. Added to the low skills reality, the South African economy is not sufficiently labour-absorptive to the extent that even if the entire workforce would be skilled, the economy would not absolve all workers into decent employment. So the creation of various labour absorptive job opportunities is vital to deal with the unemployment and poverty challenge. Mining as a critical component of the South African economy should necessarily be used to expand and industrialise the South African economy in a more developmental, instead of parasitic mechanism pursued by the current owners of Mining activities in South Africa".

Comrade Jeremy did not read this, and instead suspects that myself as President of the Youth League "and others are missing this bigger systemic picture because when they speak of mineral beneficiation they are thinking of bling...sorry, jewellery". Can it be possible that we dedicating our struggle against prejudices elsewhere whilst they exist within the organisation?

Black people and particularly Africans in Mining do not own anything above 10% of the Minerals extraction, production and trade in South Africa. Even those who think they own, do so on behalf of white owned and controlled Banks. It is an open secret that majority of shareholder capitalists in Mining are heavily indebted, and why is it that the main concern for Comrade Jeremy is the Youth League's imagined efforts to save blacks and Africans in the economy through Nationalisation.

Cde Jeremy's silence on the wealth that will be transferred from the white minority to the black and particularly African majority is very loud. It appears that the only concern Comrade Jeremy has is that these black indebted shareholder capitalists will be saved by the call for Nationalisation and nothing else. The Nationalisation that should happen should never be a blindly driven programme, but extremely cautious as it might impact on the government fiscus and disable the ANC government's capacity to build better lives for all.

If Indeed Gold Mining will cause more cost instead of benefit South Africa, then we will not concentrate our energies on Gold. Platinum, chrome, manganese, diamond, coal, and most of the other 54 minerals continue to be strategic minerals and their extraction, production and trade should benefit the people as a whole.

Expropriation?

The question of expropriation does not arise and squarely falls within the conceptual framework we previously raised, that "depending of the merits of the each case based on "balance of evidence", nationalisation may involve expropriation with or without compensation". This is vital and should be decided on a case by case basis. Part of the models we are considering as an approach to Nationalisation of Mines is the Botswana model where De Beers is a 50% partnership with the Botswana government and still pays royalties and tax.

None of the Mining Licence Holders in South Africa currently have more than 30 years licence, and a substantial part of the country's platinum and other vital minerals is not mined, entailing that if the partnership model is the one endorsed by the ANC National General Council in September 2010, the people of South Africa will be benefiting from as soon as new partnerships are entered into.

Conclusion

The Constitutional Court will not be involved in all these because our call for Nationalisation and its ultimate realisation will never violate the Constitution. We have sufficient political power and the question is whether we have the capacity, courage and will to use political power for the benefit of the people as a whole. Whilst important for the life of the organisation, debates should not seek to undermine the intellectual capacity of other comrades, but should be used as contribution to the development of our movement.

Ideologues of the movement should never be tempted to fall into an arrogant trap and believe that they are the only ones capable of expressing views, and completely not care about engaging with (or at least read) official perspective positions of the component organisations of the National Liberation Movement.

The ANC YL will interact with all discussion documents of the movement, including the SACP Special National Congress documents, but will never agree to be co-opted to reformist programmes and projects of anyone. South Africa in 2009, more than in other period in its history, is strategically in a space and period to Nationalise Mines.

The Communist Party should in this instance always seek to enrich the debate and discussion on the Nationalisation of Mines and avoid joining reactionary and counter-revolutionary forces who believe the status quo in terms of property relations is acceptable. No amount of bickering from both Right and fake-Left forces will diminish our efforts to ensure that Mines and other strategic sectors of the South African economy are nationalised. We also do not need the permission of white political messiahs to think.

Statement issued by the President of the ANC Youth League, Julius Malema, November 19 2009

Click here to sign up to receive our free daily headline email newsletter

Services

Subscribe to newsletters
News feeds


Share this article

Facebook Facebook Google Google Laaik.it Laaik.it
Yahoo! Yahoo! Digg Digg del.icio.us del.icio.us


 
 
This call in Comrade Jeremy's books is reduced to the ANC YL's obsession with bling to the extent that we can never think anything developmental, but bling. It is sad that previously, those who look like us were considered intellectually inferior by the white supremacists, and today Comrade Jeremy reflects the same sentiment, even before he interacts with the views of the ANC YL."
Julius Malema
 

Comments

 
 responses to this article

Cronin "staughted"!
"Author, author, author please!"

This reply is too well constructed for that guy that we see on ZA News (www.mg.za) or is there a ghost (writer) in the House (Luthuli)?

But what does this mean Cmde Malema: " ... the ANC YL's obsession . .more

by selcool on November 19 2009, 23:06
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Observing this space
On the above comment, judging from the tone, style and emotion of the reply, i bet you my life on the author 'fikile mbalula'. Its a good response but i know cronins style, he will retaliate with a stronger, cogently, more marxist reply. Hehehe

by Malcom X on November 20 2009, 00:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

The English, she is broken
Can Mr Malema please explain (in English this time, if possible) what the following is supposed to mean:
"Nationalisation [...] should [...] entail democratising the commanding heights of the economy, to ensure they are not just legally owned by . .more

by Darwin on November 20 2009, 07:26
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

the big debate
come now folks, the compromised solution is national socialism....just like the form we saw in germany under the nazi's........the tripartheid alliance = nazi party ideologies!!!

by onlooker on November 20 2009, 07:29
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

And we believe that JulieBabe wrote this himself !

by Piet on November 20 2009, 07:32
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

What a fake
Definitely not julius's words. Wonder where he copied that from, I think he if he read the above report he probably would not undestand a bit of it and would suffer a brain siezure.

by Ha Ha on November 20 2009, 07:40
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

What?
Hey malenema - did you write all that by yourself? I don't believe it for one second! There is no way malema can string two coherent words together that make sense, nevermind such a longwinded rambling piece of work. Some one else wrote this...

by Sias on November 20 2009, 07:58
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Please
Julius, please, if you are going to attempt a reply, please at least make it seem somewhat plausible that you wrote it yourself!

by DoorKnob on November 20 2009, 08:00
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Good old Julius obscuring his real activities
This smoke screen is merely a ploy to detract from his real activities that support his lavish life style. Hitler too had such thugs. Hopefully Zuma will be able to control this thug before he becomes too powerful.

by Albie on November 20 2009, 08:04
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Couldn't Resist
We also do not need the permission of white political messiahs to think.

Enough already, what does race have anything to do with this? Again, the same broken record.

by DoorKnob on November 20 2009, 08:13
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

QUALIFIED CARPENTER
Who sez our education system is / has gone down the tubes. Here's a perfect example of an unqualified carpenter who obviously got a distinction in gobledegook!

by WTF... on November 20 2009, 08:15
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Message to the rest of SA.
Please sit up and take notice for the ANC's RUNT has spoken!

by LongFellow on November 20 2009, 08:15
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

On the day of Reckoning during question time.
Dear Lord please tell us why in the bigger scheme of things, were cockroaches, flies and the ANC YL followers created ?

by Phaedrus on November 20 2009, 08:16
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema Mining Ltd
Why does the ANCYL not open their own mine and prove their theory that it will benefit the people? The State owns the mineral resource, submit your plan to the DME and have a go. But good luck with raising the capital and hiring the required skills with . .more

by African on November 20 2009, 08:21
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Beeg Werds
Eish, Cde Malema. thees r beeg werds! U rite or sembady els?

by Eish on November 20 2009, 08:33
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Wonder what happened to that great communist Geraldine Fraser moloeketi?

by Piet on November 20 2009, 08:42
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

stepping out
what i always guessed, malema is a closet speech writer and author of several books, wonder what his non de plume is?

by snore on November 20 2009, 09:01
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Exclusive - Julius' original speech he asked his speech writer to flesh out
"We wanna Nationalise the mines cos they dig up gold and we wanna get our hands on all that lovely gold stuff"

by Sad Days on November 20 2009, 09:17
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

re: secrets, lies and democracy
In an article on American democracy, Noam Chomsky says that all corporate structures are fascist, I would go one further to say that all organisations and institutions structured on the principle since if they have positions such as chief executive . .more

by Ekenj on November 20 2009, 09:21
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Talk more nationalization please Mr Julius
The more he talks nationalization the more companies will take their operations
ofshore until companies like Anglo are only represented by a secretary. This will only contibute to umemployment. Companies like Anglo would probably love it if he . .more

by The Wolf on November 20 2009, 09:24
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Definitely not the Runt of the Pack.
Hitler Jugen had an Alsation to lead the pack, a dog known for intelligence & timed attack.
JM is a Rottweiler - attacks with teeth & no intelligence.
Called "street smarts" to rouse his pack to frenzy.

by old, female on November 20 2009, 09:25
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema oh my Malema
Juvenile Julius has almost responded with a passion play of note.
He should understand that the government has already nationalised SAA, SABC, Eskom, and a few others - how is he proposing to run the mines for example when these nationalised assets . .more

by what a chop on November 20 2009, 09:28
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

content
how does a guy who fails woodwork and cant string a coherent sentence together on TV write this. what a joke - he probably doesnt even understand it.

by mj on November 20 2009, 09:45
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Political scientology ... based in truth but 'vrot' with lies
Never deal in the truth, never acknowledge it nor wrestle with its constraints ... twist it up with lies, with partial/convenient truths and with jargon and many will be deceived. Its what these politicians deal in (and incidentally also at the root of . .more

by Believer (... not!) on November 20 2009, 10:14
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

well, what if julius actually wrote this?
we often label misguided zeal as stupidity. julius is no idiot and that why so many whites loathe & fear him. and he really looks a lot like mao :)

by meetjoeblack on November 20 2009, 10:15
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Julius please visit Zimbabwe to see the future
A good response - a pity about the racial undertone of whoever wrote it.
Its a pity it is not as easy as it sounds ... creating and encouraging new investment from anywhere will reward your people..not just taking existing successful business. Take a . .more

by Fred on November 20 2009, 10:18
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Mock him all you like
This guy, and his policies, are our future. And it does not bode well.

by Swazi on November 20 2009, 10:30
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Unbelievable
Juju Baby would have us believe that he is
a. capable of writing ANYTHING at all let alone this
b. more communist that Jeremy Cronin

Stand in line, Juju Baby..
No, no, right at the back...if you can find it.
Stop . .more

by Al on November 20 2009, 10:40
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@ Eish-Beeg Wedds
Baas Ellekk hee rite thees forra mee.

by J.M. on November 20 2009, 10:44
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema
A very good article, Comrade Malema...
A very good article indeed.

by Moxster on November 20 2009, 10:47
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

JM
JC & SACP are quite correct in punting for "socialisation" within a free enterprise system as opposed to "Nationalisation". Nationalisation has never empowered or enriched the "people". It is more likely to harm an economy and thus its people whilst . .more

by Wiseguy on November 20 2009, 10:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

JM
JC & SACP are quite correct in punting for "socialisation" within a free enterprise system as opposed to "Nationalisation". Nationalisation has never empowered or enriched the "people". It is more likely to harm an economy and thus its people whilst . .more

by Wiseguy on November 20 2009, 10:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

JM
JC & SACP are quite correct in punting for "socialisation" within a free enterprise system as opposed to "Nationalisation". Nationalisation has never empowered or enriched the "people". It is more likely to harm an economy and thus its people whilst . .more

by Wiseguy on November 20 2009, 10:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Ja sure Woody (aka Julie baby)
If Malema wrote this article, I will take up woodwork classes as penance for my insolence!

by Reaper on November 20 2009, 10:59
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

JOOJOO
JooJoo you naughty boy you did not write this yourself!

by Andy on November 20 2009, 11:05
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Obviously Cronin is a racist
Does anybody have an idea what a 'reactionary' is?

by Cynic on November 20 2009, 11:19
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

who wrote this claptrap for you julius ?
Take your comrade Russian cr-p and shove it.

by Basil on November 20 2009, 11:19
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

seems a carefully orchestrated plan to me
First we have a well written article from SACP about their policy with regards to nationalization of the mines and the next day an equally well written reply from the ANCYL. All the while we have complete silence from the president. Something is up and it . .more

by Mischa on November 20 2009, 11:20
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

And all from a bunch of dimwits that could not string a coherent sentence together if they tried
nochal

by Mischa on November 20 2009, 11:21
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Time to get out...
Don't mock the little pr**k. The dark clouds have gathered over SA, and do NOT look back in 3 years time at all that is broken, maimed, raped and pilfered, crying, we never saw this coming! The open hatred of the whites, policies and strategies that . .more

by The Saint on November 20 2009, 11:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

My President keeps on growing in stature
He is a marvel indeed. Well balanced article President Malema never sell out to the right wing and keep on exposing these fake communists.

by Jemza on November 20 2009, 11:38
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema hits it on the HEAD!
Why were the mines not nationalized in 1994? Was it mere coincidence that Chris Hani, Oliver Thambo, and Adries Treurnicht ended up dead in the space of a few days in April 1993, a critical time in SA history? Right, I know, I'm just a conspiracy nut..

by bittereinder on November 20 2009, 11:44
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Vat hom Flaffie !!!
Vat hom laag !!!

by pj on November 20 2009, 11:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Vavi
Where is Vavi's response - or did they run out of ghost-writers?
Viva Cronin!

by pj on November 20 2009, 11:55
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

copy and paste....
@julius.. well done, if these are your words...
i'm a white oke and i firmly belive that the people need to be compensated for the wealth beneath our feet.. i ask though....am i included in "the people"?

or is it just black . .more

by Super Duper on November 20 2009, 12:09
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

flying pigs..
it was once said....


never play in the mud with a pig..you'll get dirty and the pig might enjoy it.....

by Super Duper on November 20 2009, 12:10
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Julius is a viking!!!
Hey Julius , you remind me of a viking bezerker !!! I know there is no word for that in Pedi!! Basically , its a guy who through his incoherent irrational and scary behaviour , forces the opposing army to run away in fear!! Not us my friend! we will stop . .more

by White and proud on November 20 2009, 12:26
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

I don't care
I don't care who wrote it... I don't care how long it is... and I don't care how intellectual it is... The government has failed to Eskom, SABC, SASSOC, ArmsCore, everything they touch turns to S***... why would we take SA's biggest sector and do the . .more

by Simon on November 20 2009, 12:28
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Beneficiation
Only a few will benefit from nationalisation and that is old Julius and his friends. We only need to look at what Jacob and his friends in parlaiment do with our taxes to realise that old motormouth Julius wants to use the Freedom Charter as an excuse to . .more

by Julius on November 20 2009, 12:42
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

communists
I found it funny that Malema "knows" so much about communism. I had been unfortunate enough that growing up in communist Eastern Europe I had to study marxism (the founding philosphy of communism) at university level. We were told (unofficially of course) . .more

by the_hun on November 20 2009, 13:16
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Nearly...
Julius nearly got through without a racist knee jerk, but slipped up in the last line....

by Mike on November 20 2009, 13:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Swazi
I agree with you. Our tendency to mock this imbecile runs the risk of obfuscating the very real threat that he personifies. For a more elegant and cogent exposition on this, see Jacob Dlamini's column in the Business Day . .more

by Jean Racine on November 20 2009, 13:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

I find it funny
that when I mentioned in past comments on other articles the persuasive, charming, hard working, intellectual and skilled negotiators that underpin the expendable puppets that currently dominate the public stage I received mocking jibes. Seems you are now . .more

by . on November 20 2009, 14:04
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Ok who really wrote that????
And similar to Nelsons long walk to freedom - is there an abridged version?

by Frikkie on November 20 2009, 14:22
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

that boy julius again
i can see why you got 20% for woodwork jules...its because you was focusing on your english. good article boy, could understand what da P*** u were on about, but nice anyway...

by whip me on November 20 2009, 14:26
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

JM's reply to JC
Malema, if you wrote that article I'll eat my chisel.

by The Bard on November 20 2009, 14:55
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

violent crime
This morning on 702 news they reported on the woman who, after being hi-jacked was then driven to a 60metre bridge and thrown off. -for no reason. The report included a warning from the authorities, to:- 'be extra alert from now on because the motive for . .more

by Soft target on November 20 2009, 15:04
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

wow
after reading all that i wondered what stimulating comments might take this important debate forward...but since no one has shown the capacity to reason - and most have resorted to ridicule - i might have to start taking the only person who really takes . .more

by trac on November 20 2009, 15:14
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Outsourcing is the way to go
Julius obviously now has the means to employ a ghost writer. He should follow JZ's example and plump for the best. This would mean employing a whitey, which might annoy the BMF.

But so what? If JZ can do it, why not his anointed President- in- . .more

by flebus on November 20 2009, 15:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Julius and only Julius alone........
Julius and only Julius alone can generate 50 comments with ease.......effortlessly.
Your great grandkids will definitely read about Malema in their history ...like it or not.

by Jules on November 20 2009, 15:53
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

What a response
What a response by Fikile Mbalula. I am enjoying this, come Cronin we have been asking for the debate on the matter. You have now gotten the pig out of the sack we can now discuss the matter.

I still feel that there is too much of high tackles . .more

by Gambu on November 20 2009, 16:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Speechless
sorry whaat?
Ph@ck me gently with a jackhammer. Julius is hiding his true talent. I am amazed. But what does he mean? Did the collapse of communism prove nothing? Give me facts not a load of highly worded fiction. Where has this great shining example . .more

by Bryan on November 20 2009, 18:23
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Communism
Only in Africa will they still attempt to market communism and everything else that has failed worldwide. How many times will Africans walk away from the wall with bloodied foreheads before they realise that the wall will not move.

by Pieter on November 20 2009, 19:07
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Gambu
It may not be an English class, but it is an English blog. It would have made no difference anyway, it would be worthless gobbledygook in any language. Communism is not dead, it was stillborn. It never got off the ground. It is just a load of C*** to gain . .more

by Jeff on November 20 2009, 22:36
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

I bet you Julius wrote his speech with a red wax crayon on a oily..
tjeekan brownpaper he picked up in from of some Tjeekan take-away shoppe, this speech above was done by someone else... come on Julius show us your true colors, draw some pics with your crayons where you sit on your tricycle.

by whataphoezjulius on November 21 2009, 07:05
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Proof of the pudding is in the eating
I rest my case

by Andrew on November 21 2009, 10:43
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Garbage
Well-drafted garbage. I just wish Malema could ask the author to explain to him what this artcile means.

by S Maseko on November 21 2009, 11:26
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Garbage
Well-drafted drivel.Malema is not capable of writing such garbage.This garbage is too sophisticated for him

by S Maseko on November 21 2009, 11:37
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Nationalisation
these 2 pen pals are debating how it should be done, not whether it's going to happen. That is scary, and agree with Simon's sentiments above, because, ANC to date has not made any success stories out of major parastatals it has been in control of to . .more

by Rogi on November 21 2009, 13:09
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Nationalisation of Mines
It is not a paradox that Transnet,Eskom,SABC,SAA have problems like many entities world-wide.America is the same etc.Nationalisation of our resources does not always mean 'turn in it in to State Entitie'.Malema said it. We need a model to be debated by . .more

by Senzo on November 21 2009, 14:11
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Floyd wrote this for malima
Some1 wrote this for malima. He cannot think like this. And I think i know the person - Nyiko.

by Chief on November 21 2009, 14:26
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

PROFESSOR MALEMA VRS JEREMY
The "prof" says they have political power and that Jeremy this time is speaking for white reactionaries ironic indeed.But it is obvious the centre is not holding considering the bickering.Citizens please hold on to the fall out as we navigate this complex . .more

by JOE on November 21 2009, 14:55
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

debate
What struck me most clearly about the two articles (Cronin's and Malema's) is the contrasting tone. Cronin's tone is that of the objective debator who logically sets out an argument based on reason not personal antagosism...Malema's (or whoever is . .more

by CM on November 21 2009, 15:12
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Julius M
If JM (& Writer) really believe that the readers of this column are such idiots that they will accept this s--t as being JM work.
Iit is time that we idiots concoct and plot a trap for JM and his kind that will devour them.
Trouble is JM & mates . .more

by Driewiel on November 21 2009, 15:28
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

JM
One should dare JM to come and read this so called response to an audience.
Bet he would get by the first three paragraphs.
Then ask him to explain the contents of the letter.
Nnnnooo!!
One cannot ridicule this guy. He does a better job . .more

by Driewiel on November 21 2009, 15:37
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

A welcome sight
"When you see discord amongst the troops of your enemy, be of good courage; but if they are united, then be upon your guard. When you see contention amongst your enemies, go and sit at ease with your friends; but when you see them of one mind, string your . .more

by SoLaR on November 21 2009, 15:50
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@SoLaR
What you see is often only what you perceive it to be. Do not understimate the enemys ability to deceive. They are clever bastards.

by . on November 22 2009, 16:09
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Bottom line.
The bottom line remains the same : Nationalisation of the mines in SA would be insane!

by Oompah on November 22 2009, 21:43
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

malema
thats why he needs body guards
to keep on talking rubbish

by ivan on November 23 2009, 08:14
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

SOLD OUT SOLD OUT
Exactly my point. As I commented to Cronin's piece, section 25 of the constitution must go and the ruling party has a political power to do that. The majority of the comments just exposes that having acess to technology does not necessarily amount to . .more

by Moses Gayiya on November 23 2009, 09:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema should go to school first
juluis is clueless about nationalisation of mines-he just like to talk about it- he is a complete fool, if he want to prove to the SA youth that he is their leader he should them why he thinks that mines shud b nationalised and not to call people . .more

by Maca on November 23 2009, 09:42
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Leave Malema alone
The individuals who are hurling insults at the ANCYL president are just misguided and jealous.One doesnt need a degree or a masters to lead an organisation.Whether Malema hired a ghost writer or not is not an issue here.Thats is why Head of States employ . .more

by Simbarashe Zarura on November 23 2009, 10:06
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema's ghost writer
I say this without any fear of contradiction that Mbalula wrote this piece. Malema is incapable of quoting from any book now or in history. Malema and Zuma are incapable of reading.

by Lwi on November 23 2009, 10:32
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Mo ja morago ke kgoshi (The one who laughs last laughs the best)
Write Malema off, belittle him and reduce him to your desired nothing but check who shall laugh last. Malema is one man who stands for the truth and is not afraid to tell it like it is. If there is a mesiah for Africans and those who stand for the truth . .more

by Marumo on November 23 2009, 16:33
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

He who laughs last is of slow wit,
and in your case - slow understanding.

by @Marumo on November 23 2009, 21:38
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Name
Subject
Comment