The Changing Sociology of Cricket: A South African Parable
When Jack Cheetham was about to lead the South African cricket team to Australia in 1951 there was some discussion about the fact that the Queen always turned out to greet visiting sides at Lords and that it would accordingly be nice if the prime minister, Dr. D.F. Malan, could give the team a South African send off.
Malan graciously agreed and the team traipsed off to Groote Schuur for tea. Everything went well until just before the end when Malan turned to the team and said he really hoped they'd enjoyed visiting South Africa. For the whole team was English-speaking and Malan had imagined they were an English touring side.
Not many years later, when Verwoerd was in power one of his Ministers mentioned to him that things had reached a very tense stage in a South Africa v. England Test Match. "Yes, but who's doing best", he replied, "our English or their English?" The point of both stories being that at that time cricket was very much the game of white English-speakers: for apartheid reasons men like d'Oliveira were excluded and Afrikaners were a rarity in the game.
This is very much to the point in thinking about the situation today - and it is why both the new boss of SA cricket, Willie Basson, and Business Day's columnist, Telford Vice, are wrong just to say that cricket must represent national demographics and thus its future must be black (see here). Instead, it must represent the demographics of those who play the game. There is, after all, no "ought" about this.
One can't tell black South Africans that they "ought" to play cricket or hockey instead of soccer so that our hockey or cricket team looks more representative. People choose their own sports and they have every right to do so. Almost every Russian world chess champion has been Jewish and even when the Russians lost it was to Bobby Fischer, another Jew - but no one thinks that this failure to mirror world demography lessens the prestige of the world champions.