PARTY

Julius Malema expelled from the ANC - NDC

Derek Hanekom
29 February 2012

Committee says ANCYL president must vacate his position, but can appeal sanction to NDCA

NDC STATEMENT ON MITIGATION AND AGGRAVATION FINDINGS

29 February 2012

1. Comrades Julius Malema, Sindiso Magaqa and Floyd Shivambu were charged and found guilty of misconduct in terms of rule 25 of the ANC Constitution.  The findings were confirmed on appeal and the National Disciplinary Committee (NDC) has heard evidence in mitigation and aggravation of sanction.

2. Comrade Floyd Shivambu showed remorse with respect to the charges of swearing at a journalist.  With respect to all other charges the charged members maintained that they had nothing wrong, that the charges were politically motivated and that they did not accept the findings of either the NDC or the National Disciplinary Committee of  Appeal.

3. The NDC considered the seriousness of the misconduct and has imposed sanctions commensurate with this.  A summary of the findings of the NDC is attached for the information of ANC members and the public.

4. The NDC also reminds all ANC members that, at its public announcement of the outcome of the disciplinary hearing, extensive reference was made to the ANC Constitution; the aims, objectives and character of the ANC; the injunctions of the September 2010 National General Council and the prevailing circumstances during the main hearing.  The NDC again reminds all ANC members of their solemn commitment at the time of joining the ANC.

I solemnly declare that I will abide by the aims and objectives of thee African National Congress set out in the Constitution , the Freedom Charter and other duly adopted policy positions, that I am joining the organization voluntarily and without motives of material advantage or personal gains, that I agree to respect the Constitution and the structures and to work as a loyal member of the organization, that I will place my energies and skills at the disposal of the organization and carry out tasks given to me, that I will work towards making the ANC an even more effective instrument of liberation in the hands of the people, and that I will defend the unity and integrity of the organization and its principles, and combat any tendency towards disruption and factionalism.

5.   In the light of public statements made by the ANC Youth League  and Respondents following the main NDC hearing and the NDCA hearing, the NDC advises members to faithfully observe their solemn commitment and to fully familiarize themselves with the ANC Constitution.

Derek Hanekom

Chairperson of the ANC NDC

AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS NATIONAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE

Public Announcement on the Disciplinary hearings of:

FLOYD SHIVAMBU Respondent

JULIUS MALEMA Respondent

SINDISO MAGAQA Respondent

Luthuli House, Johannesburg 29 February 2012

PREAMBLE

1. The National Disciplinary Committee (NDC) was instructed by the National Disciplinary Committee of Appeal (NDCA) on 4 February 2012 to hear evidence in mitigation and aggravation of sanction in the cases involving comrades Sindiso Magaqa, Floyd Shivambu and Julius Malema.

2. The NDC has considered the evidence of witnesses and that of the charged members in mitigation of sanction, as well as evidence in aggravation of sanction.

3. The NDC has discharged its duty without fear or favour and has not been swayed by any outside party. All its decisions have been made on the evidence before it and a complete Record of the proceedings is available to support its conclusion.

4. At its public announcement of the outcome of the disciplinary hearing, the NDC referred extensively to the ANC Constitution; the aims, objectives and character of the ANC; the injunctions of the September 2010 National General Council and the prevailing circumstances during the hearing. In addition, the NDC specifically drew the attention of ANC members to the solemn commitment made by members at the time of joining the ANC.

5. In the light of public statements made by the ANC Youth League and the Respondents following the main NDC hearing and the NDCA hearing, the NDC advises members to faithfully observe their solemn commitment and to fully familiarise themselves with the ANC Constitution.

6. The ANC has the right at all times to explain and clarify its disciplinary proceedings and approaches to discipline. However, in all disciplinary proceedings, representatives, members, structures and employees of the ANC should respect the sub judice principle and not comment on the specifics of the cases. This would avoid any semblance of the perception that their utterances could be construed to influence the outcome.

FINDING

A. Background

1. On 10 November 2011 the National Disciplinary Committee ("NDC") found the Respondents guilty of committing various acts of misconduct in terms of Rule 25.5 of the ANC Constitution and imposed a sanction in each case.

2. The Respondent, Sindiso Magaqa, was found guilty of contravening Rule 25.5(o) of the ANC Constitution for issuing, in his capacity as SG of the ANC Youth League, a derogatory and potentially defamatory statement about comrade Malusi Gigaba, a member of the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the ANC and the Minister of Public Enterprises.

3. The Respondent, Floyd Shivambu, was found guilty of contravening Rule 25.5(o) of the ANC Constitution for swearing at a journalist and for issuing, in his capacity as spokesperson of the ANC Youth League, a statement on Botswana in contravention of ANC policy.

4. The Respondent, Julius Malema, was found guilty of contravening Rules 25.5(c) and (i) of the ANC Constitution for expressing his personal views at a press conference of the ANC Youth League on 31 July 2011 which sought to portray the ANC government and its leadership under President Zuma in a negative light in relation to the African agenda and which had the potential to sow division and disunity in the ANC, and for expressing his personal views on Botswana which contravened ANC policy.

5. The Respondents appealed to the National Disciplinary Committee of Appeal (NDCA) against the findings and raised legal and factual arguments regarding the sanction imposed by the NDC.

6. On 4 February 2012 the NDCA dismissed the appeals against the findings involving the three respondents listed above, but provided the following directive in respect of sanction:

6.1 As prayed for by the Appellants, the matter is referred back to the NDC to determine an appropriate sanction after hearing evidence in mitigation and aggravation of sanction that the parties may wish to present.

6.2 Such hearing shall be concluded by the NDC within 14 (fourteen) days from date hereof and the NDC is directed to provide appropriate guidelines to the parties for the expeditious finalisation of the process.

6.3 In terms of the articulation between the ANC Constitution and Article 11.2 of the ANC Youth League Constitution, any sanction imposed by the NDC resulting in the imposition of a penalty of suspension of membership or expulsion from the ANC shall be applicable to the Appellant's membership of the ANC Youth League.

EVALUATION BY THE NDC

7. In determining appropriate sanctions, the NDC took into consideration evidence led during the hearing, the evaluation of evidence in mitigation and aggravation of sanctions and the approach in the ANC Constitution towards sanctions.

Respondents' arguments

8. A substantial part of the evidence given by the Respondents in mitigation of sanction was directed at reducing their blameworthiness. They sought to offer justification for the commission of the offences and to make out a case that the charges were political in nature, which required a political solution and not disciplinary action.

Comrade Sindiso Magaqa

9. In the case of comrade Magaqa, it was argued that the statement was issued because the ANC Youth League was provoked by comrade Gigaba's characterisation of the debate on nationalisation of mines as reckless.

10. This argument was dismissed by the NDC in its Finding and confirmed by the NDCA. Consequently, the NDC does not consider it necessary to restate its Finding. Furthermore, the NDC is of the view that there is nothing "political" about making derogatory and potentially defamatory statements about a member of the NEC.

Comrade Floyd Shivambu

11. In the case of comrade Shivambu, the NDC has already dismissed the argument that the comrade was provoked by the journalist and this Finding was confirmed by the NDCA.

12. The NDC does not accept that there is anything "political" about swearing at a journalist.

13. With regard to comrade Shivambu's conviction on the second count for issuing a statement on Botswana in contravention of ANC policy, the NDC reject the accusation that there is a political motive in the charge. The ANC has a policy on Party-to-Party relations and the Respondent contravened that policy, as already stated in the NDC finding on 10 November 2011 and subsequently confirmed by the NDCA.

Comrade Julius Malema

14. With regard to the charges against comrade Malema, the NDC does not accept that there is a political motive in the charges.

15. The NDC Finding which was confirmed by the NDCA, was that comrade Malema had publicly expressed his personal views in contravention of ANC policy, thereby sowing divisions within the organisation and bringing the organisation into disrepute.

16. Full reasons for the finding against comrade Malema were set out in the Finding and the NDC does not consider it necessary to restate these reasons.

All three Respondents

17. The arguments by all three Respondents that they were convicted for acting in a representative capacity and for utterances and statements made by a collective or for repeating the statement of the ANC Youth League were also dealt with at length in the NDC Findings and were rejected. The NDCA subsequently confirmed the Findings of the NDC.

18. The argument advanced by the Respondents that they submitted resolutions of their Congress to the ANC leadership timeously, was not accepted by the NDC because according to the evidence led the resolutions were submitted after the commission of the offenses in question.

19. Having considered the arguments raised by the Respondents, the NDC finds that there was no justification for their actions and utterances. Consequently, their blameworthiness is not reduced.

20. The evidence of comrades Andile Lungisa and Abner Mosaase was premised on the understanding that comrade Malema was found guilty for acting as a representative of the ANC Youth League and for repeating an ANC Youth League statement.

21. After listening to their evidence, the NDC is convinced that these two comrades did not read the Findings of the NDC and the NDCA because if they had, they would have understood the basis upon which comrade Malema was found guilty. For this reason the NDC finds that their evidence is not helpful to the Respondents, particularly comrade Malema.

22. The NDC also does not accept comrades Mosaase's evidence that in the ANC Youth League matters of ill discipline are dealt with politically. The ANC Youth League Constitution sets out an elaborate formal procedure for dealing with misconduct.

23. The above arguments advanced by all three Respondents do not offer any mitigation, but instead offer a defense against findings which were made by the NDC and confirmed by the NDCA.

The relationship between the ANC and its members

24. The ANC owes a duty not only to its members, including the Respondents, but to all South Africans to ensure that discipline is maintained in pursuit of the fundamental goal "to construct a united, non-racial, non-sexist, democratic and prosperous South Africa".

25. For this reason the NDC has taken into account the evidence given by the Complainant's witnesses in the main disciplinary hearings about the negative impact that the Respondents' misconduct has had on South Africa and its people for the purpose of determining an appropriate sanction.

26. As a voluntary organisation, the ANC has the power to regulate its internal affairs in terms of the ANC Constitution, including the right to refuse membership, and to suspend or expel any of its members.

27. Rule 25 of the ANC Constitution requires all members, without exception, to abide by the Constitution of the NEC and sets out acts, which constitute misconduct. Without the power to discipline members in the event of misconduct the ANC runs the risk that members could distort the character, purpose, and historic mission of the ANC.

28. All Disciplinary Committees, including the NDC and NDCA, are structures created in terms of the ANC Constitution for the purpose of maintaining discipline within the ANC. Their decisions must be respected by all members, structures and organs of the ANC.

29. The ANC Constitution promotes the principles of freedom of speech and free circulation of ideas and information within its ranks, provided that a member does not contravene the disciplinary code as set out in Rule 25.5 of the ANC Constitution and with regard to Rule 25.2(a).

30. Rule 25.5 set out twenty-eight (28) acts of misconduct in respect of which disciplinary proceedings may be invoked and instituted against ANC members. Acts of misconduct which seek to sow division or a breakdown of unity in the ANC and which bring the organisation into disrepute are specifically intended in the ANC Constitution to protect the core values, character, unity and historic mission of the ANC.

31. The relationship between the ANC and the three Respondents is contractual in nature. When the Respondents joined the ANC they took the membership oath; they were fully aware of the provisions of the ANC Constitution; they considered themselves bound by the ANC Constitution and they undertook to respect the ANC Constitution and its structures.

32. The potential for sanction arising from breach of discipline, including suspension or expulsion from the ANC, is part of the consideration that a person accepts in return for admission to the ANC as a member. A member is fully aware of this possibility at the outset when he or she joins the ANC.

33. As set out in the ANC Constitution the ANC is a voluntary organization, which people join willingly because they subscribe to its aims, objectives, culture, ideals and value system. This is the glue that has held the ANC together for a hundred years. No one is forced to join the ANC or compelled to remain in the ANC. In the same spirit, the ANC should not be obliged to associate with any member or to retain the active participation of any member, without exception, who pays scant regard to the membership oath of the ANC, its character and unity, aims and objectives and the policies of the organisation.

Factors taken into consideration in deciding an appropriate sanction

34. In deciding an appropriate sanction, the NDC took into consideration the following factors:-

34.1 The seriousness of the offence;

34.2 The presence of aggravating factors;

34.3 Any previous findings against the respondents;

34.4 The presence of mitigating factors;

34.5 The concept of a graduated approach to sanctioning;

34.6 The concept that the sanction must take into consideration the interests of the ANC, the respondents and society at large; and

34.7 The sanction must fit the offence.

The seriousness of the offence

35. Comrade Sindiso Magaqa was found guilty of contravening Rule 25.5 (o) of the ANC Constitution.

36. Comrade Floyd Shivambu was found guilty on two counts of contravening Rule 25.5 (o) of the ANC Constitution.

37. Comrade Julius Malema was found guilty of contravening Rules 25.5 (c) and (i) of the ANC Constitution.

38. The NDC is of the view that all three Respondents were found guilty of committing serious offences which warrant either suspension or expulsion from the organisation.

The presence of mitigating factors

39. The Respondent, comrade Sindiso Magaqa, is a first offender and is a newly appointed member of the NEC of the ANC Youth League.

40. Comrade Floyd Shivambu sincerely apologised for swearing at the journalist. He also apologised at his hearing last year.

41. Although evidence was led at his hearing of the commission of a similar offence where the ANC had to pay money to a third party for his misconduct, comrade Floyd Shivambu is treated as a first offender for purposes of sanctioning.

42. The evidence of long-standing political involvement and good character given by comrade Soviet Lekganyane in comrade Malema's favour has been noted as a mitigating factor.

The presence of aggravating factors

43. Save for an apology from comrade Shivambu with respect to one of the charges, all three Respondents did not show any remorse or acceptance of wrong-doing.

44. The Respondents missed the opportunity to present argument in mitigation of sanction and instead challenged the findings of both the NDC and the NDCA. They largely confined their argument to insisting that the NDC and NDCA had erred in its findings.

Details of any previous findings against the respondents

45. The Respondent, comrade Julius Malema, is a repeat offender. In May 2010 he was found guilty of contravening Rule 25.5 (i) of the ANC Constitution.

The concept of a graduated approach to sanctioning

46. As stated above, the NDC is of the view that the offences committed by all three Respondents are sufficiently serious to warrant either a period of suspension or expulsion.

47. The NDC is of the view that a fine, reprimand or other corrective sanction would, in the circumstances, not fit the offence, would be inappropriate and would send the wrong message to ANC members and the wider community.

The concept that the sanction must take into consideration the interests of the ANC, the Respondents and society at large

48. The Respondents enjoy membership of the ANC, which is a liberation movement and also the ruling party and are in the privileged position of being members of the National Executive Committee of the ANC Youth League.

49. It is the responsibility of the ANC Youth League to inculcate the values of discipline and loyalty amongst its members.

Consideration of the case of Comrade Sindiso Magaqa

50. Comrade Magaqa did not testify at his disciplinary hearing. The NDC, in its discretion, gave him the benefit of doubt that he would have expressed remorse if he had testified. The NDC also adopted a remedial approach to his sanction by directing him to apologise to comrade Gigaba.

51. In his mitigation hearing, comrade Magaqa:-

51.1 Did not show any remorse;

51.2 Testified that the view of the ANC Youth League was to deal with ill-discipline politically;

51.3 The ANC Youth League would only apologise to comrade Gigaba if he was prepared to meet with the ANC Youth League to explain his views on nationalisation.

51.4 Testified that he agreed with the Youth League statement.

52. The NDC finds that comrade Magaqa has shown no remorse and his evidence has aggravated his case. The NDC also finds it extraordinary that the Secretary General of the ANC Youth League could even consider saying that issues of ill-discipline in the ANC Youth League are dealt with politically when the ANC Youth League's own Constitution provide an elaborate and formal procedure for dealing with acts of misconduct.

53. Comrade Magaga should have realized that pronouncements by him as Secretary General of an organ of the ANC would carry a lot of weight and would readily be accepted by Youth League members as authoritative.

54. Comrade Magaqa's unwarranted personal attack against comrade Gigaba was prejudicial to the integrity and repute of the ANC and constituted a serious offence.

55. The fact that he is a first offender and newly elected member of the NEC of the ANC Youth League count in his favour.

Consideration of the case of Comrade Floyd Shivambu

56. The Complainant did not lead any evidence in aggravation of sanction against comrade Floyd Shivambu.

57. Comrade Shivambu has shown no remorse for the Botswana statement which transgressed ANC policy and which differed significantly from the ANC Youth League's 24th Congress resolution on Botswana.

58. Comrade Shivambu's misconduct brought the ANC into disrepute and undermined the ANC's commitment to respect the sovereignty of states. In the view of the NDC, both offences committed by comrade Shivambu are serious.

59. Comrade Shivambu has shown remorse for swearing at the journalist.

60. For the purpose of sanctioning, he is regarded as a first offender.

Consideration of the case of Comrade Julius Malema

May 2010 findings

61. The NDC noted that in respect of the May 2010 sanctions, the corrective elements of the sanctions were not implemented.

62. The NDC's package of sanctions imposed in 2010 is severable. The first part relates to remedial action and was designed to correct comrade Malema's behaviour and make him a responsible leader. The second part serves as a deterrent that he should refrain from conduct that would bring the ANC into disrepute and sow division in the organisation.

63. The NDC finds nothing inconsistent about these sanctions because they were intended to achieve two different purposes.

64. With regard to the second part of the sanctions, comrade Malema was fully aware that should he be found guilty for contravening Rule 25.5 (i) of the ANC Constitution within two years, he ran the risk of having his ANC membership suspended "for a period to be determined by the NDC". Consequently, the NDC finds that there was an obligation on comrade Malema to observe, at least for two years, the terms of his suspended sanction and that his failure to do so obliges the NDC to impose the sanction of suspension of his ANC membership.

65. Although comrade Malema committed an extremely serious offence, he pleaded guilty, showed remorse and expressed a willingness to submit to corrective action.

Present disciplinary hearing

66. The Complainant led aggravating evidence against comrade Malema with regard to the current convictions.

67. Whilst comrade Malema testified that he subjected himself to the discipline of the ANC and that he would comply with any sanction imposed by the NDC, the NDC is particularly disturbed by the following evidence given by comrade Malema at the mitigation hearing:-

67.1 In his evidence-in-chief, comrade Malema said that he did not agree with the Findings of the NDCA and repeated it under cross- examination.

67.2 He said that he was not persuaded by the NDCA findings and will continue to challenge the outcome internally because he was unfairly found guilty.

67.3 He said that the disciplinary proceedings will come to an end but the real battle will start after that when the ANC has to persuade the youth.

68. In the NDC's view, this evidence is indicative of comrade Malema's unrepentant attitude and non-acceptance of the findings of the disciplinary machinery of the ANC, particularly the NDCA.

69. The NDC accepts that as a tribunal of first instance in this case, comrade Malema has a right not to agree with the Findings of the NDC because the ANC Constitution gives him and the other comrades the right to appeal to the NDCA.

70. However, Comrade Malema's refusal to accept the Findings of the NDCA, which confirm the findings of the NDC, is clearly untenable.

71. Comrade Malema should have known or have been advised that Rule 25.6 (a2) of the ANC Constitution declares decisions of the NDCA as final, except that the NEC may, in its discretion, review such a decision.

72. When comrade Malema joined the ANC he undertook in his membership oath to respect the ANC Constitution and its structures.

73. As stated above, both the NDC and the NDCA are structures that are created in terms of the ANC Constitution.

74. The NDC is of the view that if comrade Malema is not prepared to accept final decisions of the NDCA, then the likelihood of him respecting the ANC Constitution is remote.

75. This conclusion is reinforced by his utterance that after the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, which are conducted in terms of the ANC Constitution, the real battle will start when the ANC will still have to persuade the youth. As the President of an organ of the ANC responsible for mobilizing the youth behind the ANC, this statement, in the view of the NDC, constitutes a threat and is tantamount to holding the ANC to ransom.

76. Moreover, in his application in August 2011 to quash the charges, one of the arguments raised by comrade Malema was that the ANC Constitution was unconstitutional. In its ruling, the NDCA confirmed that he did raise this argument.

77. Comrade Malema is a repeat offender. He has now been found guilty of two serious offences in under two years whilst under suspension after his 2010 Finding; has shown no remorse; is not prepared to be disciplined by the ANC and is not prepared to respect the disciplinary machinery of the organisation.

78. Based on comrade Malema's own evidence the NDC finds that comrade Malema is, in effect, reneging on his membership oath and is not prepared to respect the ANC Constitution.

79. With regard to comrade Malema's plea not to have his membership taken away, the NDC believes that any period of suspension imposed as a sanction would not, as the Complainant's representative submitted, achieve the purpose of rehabilitating the comrade.

80. In the view of the NDC, comrade Malema's misconduct of bringing the ANC into disrepute and sowing division within its ranks is very serious.

81. The ANC Constitution demands that discipline be enforced without exception. The cumulative effect of comrade Malema's past and present offences, coupled with his own evidence of lack of remorse and disrespect for the ANC Constitution and its structures, particularly the NDCA, has left no room for the NDC to consider his misconduct as anything but extremely serious.

82. In exercising its duty to balance the interest of the Respondent on the one hand and that of the ANC and its membership as an organization on the other hand, the balance weighs in favour of the ANC to impose the sanctions as stated below.

Sanctions

83. The ANC Constitution under Rule 25.8 (a) provides for penalties or sanctions, which may be imposed by a disciplinary committee, for proven violations of the Constitution, other relevant instruments, principles, norms, policies and decisions of the ANC. Such sanctions will include reprimand, payment of compensation and/or the performance of useful tasks, remedial action and suspension of membership or expulsion from the ANC.

84. Rule 25.8 (b) provides that a disciplinary committee may suspend the imposition of any of the above penalties or sanctions, with or without conditions, for a period to be determined by such disciplinary committee.

85. The NDC evaluated and gave due weight to all the evidence and submissions, within the context of the above framework of assessment and imposed appropriate sanctions in line with the offences committed.

Sanction in the case of Comrade Floyd Shivambu

86. Having weighed and considered all factors, the NDC imposes the following sanction in respect of the two acts of misconduct of which cde Shivambu has been found guilty:

86.1 Cde Shivambu's membership is suspended for a period of three (3) years.

86.2 In accordance with the NDCA finding of 4 February 2012, this sanction is applicable to cde Shivambu's membership of the ANC Youth League. Consequently, he shall vacate his position as a member of the National Executive Committee of the ANC Youth League.

87. Cde Shivambu has the right to appeal to the NDCA against this sanction within 14 days.

Sanction in the case of Comrade Julius Malema

88. Having weighed and considered all factors, the NDC imposes the following sanction in respect to the May 2010 findings and the two acts of misconduct of which cde Malema has now been found guilty:

88.1 With regard to Cde Malema's disciplinary hearing held in May 2010, his membership is suspended for a period of two (2) years.

89. In respect of the present disciplinary hearing:

89.1 Cde Julius Malema is expelled from the ANC.

90. In respect of both findings:

90.1 In accordance with the NDCA finding of 4 February 2012, this sanction is applicable to cde Malema's membership of the ANC Youth League. Consequently, he shall vacate his position as President of the ANC Youth League.

91. Cde Malema has the right to appeal to the NDCA against this sanction within 14 days.

Sanction in the case of Comrade Sindiso Magaqa

92. Having weighed and considered all factors, the NDC imposes the following sanction in respect of the act of misconduct of which the respondent has been found guilty:

92.1 Comrade Sindiso Magaqa's membership is suspended for a period of three (3) years.

92.2 This sanction shall be suspended for a period of three (3) years and will be implemented if cde Magaqa is found guilty of any act of misconduct in terms of the ANC Constitution during the period of suspension.

92.3 In accordance with the NDCA finding of 4 February 2012, this sanction is applicable to cde Magaqa's membership of the ANC Youth League.

92.4 Subject to his right of appeal, cde Magaqa shall make a public apology to comrade Malusi Gigaba within fifteen (15) days. Failure to do so will result in Clause 92.1 coming into operation with immediate effect.

93. Cde Magaqa has the right to appeal to the NDCA against this sanction within 14 days.

Dated at LUTHULI HOUSE, JOHANNESBURG this 29th day of February 2012

Chairperson: Derek Hanekom
On behalf of ANC National Disciplinary Committee    

Click here to sign up to receive our free daily headline email newsletter



 

Comments

If you come across comments that are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate; contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs, please report them and they will be removed.
 
 responses to this article

Thats great news.
The country can celebrate...it may get worse for him when he appeals...stage 2 and 3 yet to play out...

by . on February 29 2012, 21:45
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Very Bad
ANCYL will become lame & toothless. Thanks to the Shower-Man & beard Bear. Nationalization with or without Malema. Economic Freedom & free education with, or without Malema.

by Ronnie on February 29 2012, 22:39
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

The damage he has caused ...
Will the ANC learn from this and try and get the terrible corruption, crime, murder, rape, policing irresponsible breeding, mismanagement of taxpayers money, mismanagement of all departments except the finance department, racism etc etc out of SA? I think . .more

by Thomas on February 29 2012, 22:46
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

appeal
Malema terror is over he must go back to school.

by bafana on February 29 2012, 22:47
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

failed
this is time for malema to go to school without lot in his mind

by baobao on February 29 2012, 22:54
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Juju
After creating him,today the ANC cannot tolerate him it's up to him to understand that they needed him to disgrace Cmde Mbeki.and that is politicians operate they suck you as on orange and chuck you out when the juice is klaar.Lesson for life:When you . .more

by Anonymous on February 29 2012, 22:55
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

malema expulsion from anc
Good riddance. Ndr has no room for counter revolutionaries n corrupt elements. Anc must now disband pec anc in limpopo and recall mafia boss premier mafia now. Time to rebuild our glorious movement is now or never!! All anc cadres to battle against . .more

by cde makaringe limpopo on February 29 2012, 23:21
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

julius
ANC have just expose its self. they bow dawn to the capilalist

by van wyk on February 29 2012, 23:26
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

expulsion maverick malema from anc
Second phase is immediate arrest limpopo mafia, inclusive mathale, lekganyane, motsepe, kekana, letebele, masemola, malema etc. Freeze their bank accounts and attach their assets as proceeds of crime. Hawks, sars, public protector, nia and saps must now . .more

by cde lerumo limpopo on February 29 2012, 23:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

better SA without Julias
Good news for SA!!!He thought he was the ANC. Good times lies ahead. Reign of terror is over!!!!

by jali on February 29 2012, 23:48
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Hello,
so now this clown is going to appeal and appeal and appeal again right up to the very constituitinal court that him and his party so revile. Then eventuaully him and his cronies who are in government will try and revise the constitutional courts mandate . .more

by living in exile on February 29 2012, 23:50
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

What a bunch of silly clowns!
Thomas is right, the ANC is good at talking, and reviewing, and consulting, and waffling endlessly on; but actually DOING something to clean up a mess is foreign to them. The only thing they seem to be able to DO is consuming wealth, and/or devising ways . .more

by Joe Soap on March 01 2012, 00:01
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

cde makaringe limpopo
i can not agree with you more brother. I once voted for the ANC and they have disilusiuned me as to how the new SA would be. i think a lot of people were very exited as to how the new SA should be. But the party i once had a hope for of brining about real . .more

by Living in Exile so on March 01 2012, 00:08
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Daar gaat jy boetie!
Now we see what the corruption charges will bring up. Floyd and his ilk all gone, the ANC gave some snot klappe to these yuuths.

Its a good day in Africa.

by Juliass on March 01 2012, 00:10
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Disband the ANCYL
Yes it is time to put foot down and disband the entire kindergarden youth league, they have no more purpose.

by Youuuth league comrade on March 01 2012, 00:14
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

ZANU's ANCpfYL puppet....

....has had his strings effectively snipped !

Perhaps there is hope for the real ANC to trump the ANCpf criminal fifth columnists within? Only time will tell, BUT getting rid of this super-MAMPARA is certainly a step in the right . .more

by John Austin on March 01 2012, 00:17
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Shut Him Up
Now they must just shut his racist mouth also

by The Boss on March 01 2012, 00:56
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

16 Million Mansion
I dont think Malema would be able to complete his 16 million mansion he is building in Sandton.

by Javier on March 01 2012, 01:58
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Cleanup of the ANCyl
Well done with the clean up. That's one less rotten apple to worry about.
However the real work needs to now be done with the ANC
Mother body. This is where the real clean up needs to start. SAcans are still in danger by being governed by corrupt . .more

by Jzee on March 01 2012, 05:35
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

congratulation
TNXS NDC MALEMA DESERVE DAT DECISION I WISH THOSE SMALLPIGLET BEHIND MALEMA THERE WILL LEARN 2 RESPECT DA POLITICIAN LEADERS

by xolani cele on March 01 2012, 05:46
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Good buy
A very rude, devisive, poorly informed, self indulgent, racist, individual. He caused much controversy in SA and was an embarrassment to black South Africans as he reminded the world of Idi Amin.

by Wizard on March 01 2012, 06:35
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Each Dog has its Day
Evil will never triumph over good.......Mathale and Co, you are next in sight of the disciplinary machinary

by Lethabo on March 01 2012, 06:37
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@jzee
I agree with you that the DA will get into power however I don't agree that it would be sad.
I come from a liberation movement background - believe me that the sa native congress is not the only liberation movement as they try to write into the new . .more

by david on March 01 2012, 06:45
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

big tree of limpopo has fallen
Thnx NDC,MALEMA and his Limpopo mafios must get rid off from the nation because they are danger to us youth,where is his R16M mansion?

by wolf,polowane on March 01 2012, 06:53
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

he got what he deserves
Letts see now who is puppet of USA! Swearing elders was not and never be a political career,he must go and JOIN ZANU-PF.

by sharmein lione cooper on March 01 2012, 07:02
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Mantashe era
The mantashe era is coming to an end on December. Even the prisoners are put in jail to repent from their ways, who are they to say Malema can't repent. Anyway malema stood for things that ANC deviated from when it came into power. Were did Ceril . .more

by pholasky on March 01 2012, 07:10
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

ECONOMIC FREEDOM WITH OR WITHOUT HIM
WHITE CAPITALIST COULD NOT SLEEP BECAUSE OF HIM,HE MADE THE ANC TO THINK OBOUT OUR JUDICIARY & HE INCREASED ANCYL MEMBERSHIP.HE MADE AN IMPACT.

by ANCYL on March 01 2012, 07:19
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema
I think the ANC had no option but to get rid of him because of what SARS and the police might dig up as far as tenders are concerned. The other point is that Malema in in Mugabe's pocket and Mugabe does not like Zuma. ZANU PF would have been very . .more

by Mandiso on March 01 2012, 07:27
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Symptom not Cause
I must state outright that Malema represents most of what I believe we fought against but we must remember he is only a symptom of a greater ANC problem.
We have failed to deliver on our promises of a better life for all. Too many still live on the . .more

by Colin on March 01 2012, 07:34
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

stalking horse
The reality is that even with an efficient government the promises the ANC made to gain power could never be met. Malema was a stalking horse and do not count him out....or rather if he does fade away as bad memories do, someone else will be put in place . .more

by Wendy on March 01 2012, 08:15
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Expulsion
Good riddance.... or is it? Another appeal allowed?? When will this process end? And methinks we have not heard the last of fatboy whatever happens.... Interesting to see what all ANC members sign up for... "...without motives of material advantage or . .more

by JADe on March 01 2012, 08:17
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema Hype - get perspective
Malema is a creature of the media and white fear and afro-pessimism. He had about as much influence on national affairs as Eugene Terblanche and his sad and motly lot of AWB supporters had. Even in his backwater province of Limpopo he could only manage to . .more

by Bokdrol on March 01 2012, 08:30
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Zulus 1, Pedis 0
Power herders clubbed the silly peasants

by Injala Apera on March 01 2012, 08:38
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

End or the beginning
There is a greater risk here. He's more cunning than people think and I wonder if he anticipated all of this. He has a huge following and popularity in marginalised communities/seats. If he starts his own party in national politics, he could actually win . .more

by Richie on March 01 2012, 08:40
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@bokdrol
Yes it is time that those fat cats get in their R1 million X-whatevers and come and sit on the floor and eat pap with the rest of us - there where their mothers and aunts still live. They have forgotten where they come from. But then their luxury cars . .more

by Mpugi on March 01 2012, 08:44
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Bokdrol and Mpugi
And then they still staunchly vote ANC. You get what you deserve - nice to be "liberated". Poor suckers all get conned in the name of liberation and NDR and what have you. Have they all got alcohol fetus syndrome? Unthinking people must suffer.

by Solly on March 01 2012, 08:47
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Why?
Why have a yoof lieg in this format at all? For what purpose? It made sense during the early years of the struggle when many of the older generation were numbed by the system and politically inactive and the youth was the largest core of intellectuals and . .more

by Fanjan on March 01 2012, 09:07
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

malema
Hope the teagirl has a job for the woodwork failure in the madam's kitchen!
Please not, just now he'll organize a tender to get some of his cronies to steal the cups!

by david on March 01 2012, 10:36
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

such irony
For once the ANC has carefully set about dealing with a problem. They have paid careful attention to detail and have been meticulous in their work. If they can do this when dealing with Malema why can't they be as diligent when it comes to running the . .more

by voter on March 01 2012, 10:47
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

A sad day for....
... the media. Never did the media have it so easy to find juicy and scandalous stories. Now, with Malema gone, they will be hard pressed to find another news maker that is as consistent and reliable in making an A** of himself.

I can just . .more

by Hanno on March 01 2012, 10:54
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

The damage done by this cretin
http://www.genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html

South Africa: Polarized Country

Genocide Watch returns South Africa to stage 5 “polarization” on its Countries at Risk Chart
By Genocide Watch
2 February 2012

After . .more

by Brett on March 01 2012, 11:39
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

juju
Its good that he is out. I think he misunderstood his position as an ancyl, president to that of the country. He was more focused on the issues of the mother body rather than, fighting for the issues affecting young people in South Africa, such as HIV . .more

by nathi on March 01 2012, 12:30
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Haleluja!!
Year 2012 promises to be a good one. Now, can all those journalists now stop writing about what this idiot says or does or thinks about. I am assuming he thinks at all .....

by Xolo on March 01 2012, 12:42
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Genocide watch
Brett, Genocide watch are a bunch of idiots. You can not trust one word they write.

Come give examples what they classify as level 5?
5. POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may . .more

by Julius Malemmmma on March 01 2012, 13:32
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Malema
So Malema can once again appeal?

This whole process looks like a complete farce. It kind of makes it obvious why South Africa is so badly governed when the ANC manne can't even execute a
routine disciplinary hearing within a reasonable . .more

by Merlin on March 01 2012, 13:40
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

by Julius Malemmmma on March 01 2012, 13:32
The SABC broadcasts messages like 'Viva the liberation movement, Viva! every 5 minutes. There is an entrenched culture of mass murder about which 'moderates' stay silent in the ANC - the murderous AIDS-denialism of Thabo Mbeki. There have been 'political' . .more

by Brett on March 01 2012, 14:38
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

by Julius Malemmmma on March 01 2012, 13:32
Do some homework before offering an opinion.

Who started Genocide Watch?

by Brett on March 01 2012, 14:40
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

RE: YOUR DAYS R NUMBERED
To Marima's cronies your days are numbered.Njhunju he is the former president of the ANCYL- forward with the NDR forward.MENE MENE TEKEL UFARISISN.

by Lukani Wa Mashle on March 01 2012, 15:09
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

The loss Malema caused the country
Now that Malema is gone and no-one will be talking abt nationalisation, will we see massive influx of foreigners/foreign investments into the country? If not, then his expulsion is meaningless. What or how much exactly did the country loose due to his . .more

by Manyuka on March 01 2012, 16:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Expell him
Do not let him come back to the ANCYL. The guy does not have the leadership skills, period!

by Monwabisi Gcememe on March 01 2012, 16:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

My Opinion
I have never approved of anything the ANC did, but today I can . It is actually impressive the way they had disciplined one of their own. Now if they can just clean out the rest of the country of crooks as well.

by CA Bez on March 01 2012, 20:02
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Genocide watch
Brentt I am offering you the advice due to my research into them. I should strongly advice you to do the same and not just eat up the drivel because it suite your view.

I am still waiting for your answers

by Juliass Malemmmmma on March 01 2012, 22:20
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Anc can still govern the country without malema
Anc can govern the country without malema. Malema must go back to school.

by Pastor Jan on March 05 2012, 14:04
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Congrats Man
leave Malema alone even you guys u do fraut everyday so live that guy in peace

by Goodwill on April 17 2012, 11:49
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

ANC email
Please up date on Malema's case

by Khan Matabeni on April 17 2012, 12:36
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

congra
i lv juju i hate the boers leave juju alone he will be the pres 1 day

by siphokazi mqambayiyana on May 23 2012, 11:15
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Name
Subject
Comment