DOCUMENTS

DA writes to Minister over UN vote

Kenneth Mubu
22 November 2010

Kenneth Mubu says recent action ran contrary to our constitution

UN vote: DA writes to minister

The Democratic Alliance has written a letter to the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation in response to South Africa's recent vote to remove reference to sexual orientation from a United Nations resolution on extrajudicial killings. We believe that this vote runs contrary to our constitution and will serve to weaken the international community's response to extrajudicial killings based on sexual orientation.

A copy of the letter can be found below.

Dear Minister

The Democratic Alliance (DA) has noted with concern that South Africa's United Nations delegation has voted to remove reference to sexual orientation from a United Nations resolution on extrajudicial killings. In doing so, South Africa has voted in the company of states which carry the death penalty for consensual sexual acts between adults of the same sex:  Iran, Nigeria, Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, Sudan and Saudi Arabia.

Other states which voted for the removal of reference to sexual orientation from the resolution include: Uganda, Zimbabwe, Uzbekistan, Syria, Belize, Libya, Tanzania, Comoros, Lebanon, Ethiopia, Morocco, Burundi, Eritrea, Angola, Kenya, Cameroon, Algeria, Tunisia, Kuwait, Ghana, Liberia, Senegal, Guyana, Jamaica, Sierra Leone, Malawi and Malaysia. In all of these states, homosexual acts are illegal, and punishments vary from public floggings to hefty, and in some case life, sentences.

It is very disappointing for South Africa to be among the 79 states which voted to have the amendment to this resolution passed. The explanation for this vote offered by South Africa's UN representative - that the international law is "insufficiently clear on the definition of sexual orientation", according to the official UN minutes - is patently ridiculous.

We have voted to weaken the international community's response to extrajudicial killings based on sexual orientation, and this, to be frank, makes a mockery of our constitution, which is widely regarded as one of most progressive in the world. South Africa should be leading the way in promoting LGBT rights on the African continent, and further afield. Our foreign policy should set an example. Instead, we are voting with states that publicly flog and execute their own citizens.

With neighbouring countries like Lesotho, Namibia, Botswana and Mozambique joining South Africa in voting in favour of this amendment, it is quite conceivable that, had South Africa adopted a more principled stance, we could have influenced enough other states in the region to take up the same position, and thus change the outcome of the final vote.

Before becoming president, President Zuma repeatedly demonstrated severe insensitivity to the rights of gay and lesbian South Africans. On one occasion, he stated: "When I was growing up, an ungqingili (homosexual) would not have stood in front of me. I would knock him out." More recently, the president appointed Jon Qwelane, an outspoken homophobe, as Ambassador to Uganda. Our concern is that our UN vote appears to be part of an increasing trend of disdain being shown by the Zuma administration towards the LGBT rights.

There is absolutely clear evidence that sexual orientation has been a motive for many extrajudicial killings, and that the inclusion of reference to sexual orientation in this resolution was therefore appropriate and necessary. We wish to request absolute clarity from the Department of International Relations and Cooperation as to why this decision was taken, whether the Department sanctioned it, and why South Africa appears to have been complicit in voting to undermine one of the most fundamental liberties upheld by our constitution.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Mubu

Statement issued by Kenneth Mubu, MP, Democratic Alliance Shadow Minister for International Relations and Cooperation, November 22 2010

Click here to sign up to receive our free daily headline email newsletter


Services

Subscribe to newsletters
News feeds

Share this article

Facebook Facebook Google Google Laaik.it Laaik.it
Yahoo! Yahoo! Digg Digg del.icio.us del.icio.us


 

Comments

If you come across comments that are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate; contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs, please report them and they will be removed.
 
 responses to this article

DEAR GARDEN BOY
Your Madam controlled party is not equipped for international relationship,please leave that to the ruling party until Jesus come back,if ever he will.For now go and wash the cars,do not forget to cut the grass.

by ZM on November 22 2010, 20:21
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

was a non-gay time had by all?
Which way did our glorious allies Cuba, North Korea and Venezuela vote?

by Realist on November 22 2010, 20:41
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Apologies
Dear Mr Mubu,

Please accept apologies from me. Because I sometimes talk like a racist is because I am an ANC supporter and they are racists. I think Ms Zille is very good and will make a much better prezident than the man who sings and dances. . .more

by ZM on November 23 2010, 07:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

ZM
ZM. You are a sad brainwashed $uck up!

by mike on November 23 2010, 09:16
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

ZM
I am sure you are trying to be funny but failing dismally. Try something else. Your comments ring hollow showing that you are an immature in politics and now in satire. Why use an abbreviation now, no longer proud of your name.

by Political Observer on November 23 2010, 10:45
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Disgusting
JM - Your comments are quite simply disgusting and grossly offensive. Any normal person would be deeply ashamed to make such remarks. Unfortunately the likes of you have no sense of shame! Hopefully your ilk are in the minority, if not, God help South . .more

by Karen on November 23 2010, 13:24
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Karen
Who JM?

by Jeff on November 23 2010, 19:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Writing to the sightless
What's the point of writing to a cabinet minister, they can't read.

by Jeff on November 23 2010, 19:32
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

It's a hallmark of backward unintelligent people......
.........to be homophobic. Need I say more?

by mpho on November 23 2010, 21:17
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Sorry
typo - JM = ZM

by Karen on November 24 2010, 08:46
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

UN vote
Why is it that the DA's efforts to defend issues enshrined in the SA constitution and be trivialised by such a racial diatribe (per ZM). The comments were in P******* bad taste, and say more about ZM than the issue in hand.

by JADe on November 24 2010, 11:44
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Name
Subject
Comment