Chumani Maxwele's rights were violated - SAHRC

Vincent Moaga
07 July 2011

Commission says Minister of Police refused to cooperate with inquiry


The SA Human Rights Commission has found that members of the Presidential Special Protection Unit have violated the rights of Mr Chumani Maxwele of Cape Town.

The Commission's finding follows a complaint that was lodged by the FW de Klerk Foundation's Centre for Constitutional Rights which was represented by its Director, Adv Nicola de Havilland, on behalf of Mr Maxwele.

On the 10th of February 2010, members of the unit arrested and detained Mr Maxwele for allegedly gesturing with his middle finger at a convoy of police vehicles which was reportedly transporting President Jacob Zuma. During this incident Mr Maxwele is also alleged to have resisted arrest.

Subsequent to this, the Foundation lodged a complaint with the Commission alleging that members of the unit violated Mr Maxwele's human rights as enshrined in the Constitution.

After conducting an investigation into this matter the Commission found that indeed the following rights were violated namely: Human Dignity (Section 10); Freedom and Security of the Person (Section 12); Privacy (Section 14); Freedom of Expression and peaceful/unarmed demonstration (Sections 16 & 17); Political Choice (Section 19) and the Rights of Detained Persons (Section 35).

The Minister of Police, who is a respondent in this matter, has acted in an unreasonable and unacceptable manner by initially failing to cooperate with it and respond timeously and substantively, to its request for information. As a result, the Commission proceeded to issue this report without substantive input from the Minister.

The Commission has also found that the Minister of Police should be held vicariously liable for the acts of members and employees of the South African Police Service who are found to have been acting within the course and scope of employment.

The Commission therefore recommends that the Minister, on behalf of all the members/employees who were involved in this incident, should make a full written apology to Mr Maxwele for their unlawful and unconstitutional behaviour. This apology should be submitted to the Commission within 30 days of the Minister's receipt of the Commission's report.

Furthermore, the Minister should also provide a report to the Commission within three (3) months of the date of his receipt of the report indicating its plan, with specific timeframes, towards implementing the recommended remedies, namely: that the Minister and members of the Presidential Special Protection Unit acknowledge within the said three (3) months that they accept the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of  law in accordance with Section 1(c),  as well as the duty of the state in terms of section 7(2)  to respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights.

In addition, the Commission has also recommended that Minister should indicate the steps he will take in terms of Section 199(5) of the Constitution to ensure that the South African Police Service acts, teaches and requires its members and specifically members of the unit who are found to have been involved in this matter, acts in accordance with the Constitution and the law.

Statement issued by Vincent Moaga, SAHRC, July 7 2011

Click here to sign up to receive our free daily headline email newsletter


Subscribe to newsletters
News feeds

Share this article

Facebook Facebook Google Google
Yahoo! Yahoo! Digg Digg



If you come across comments that are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate; contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs, please report them and they will be removed.
 responses to this article

Which one brother
Chumani, after u showed them your middle finger, u should've shake your hand and ask them which finger it was... Then these bloody communist agents would not have any case against you

by KGB on July 08 2011, 06:36
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Just an apology? How about an apology and compensation from Chancellor House. What is the difference between this lot and the disgusting Apartheid Security thugs?

by DM on July 08 2011, 21:49
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Arrogant ANC thugs nuh? Because they can.
The law only applies to the masses. The law dont apply to ANC and the Police. It are blatantly evident from the number of articles and complaints. It are their time to be bullies and arrogant pigs.

by Klilling on July 08 2011, 22:53
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Does this mean it's ok?
Does this mean that it is fine for citizens to give politicians the middle finger? If so, we should all do it every time we see one of the corrupt ones. Instead of hating them, we should show them contempt.

by MK on July 12 2011, 21:50
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it