DOCUMENTS

Shouldn't we just close down the SANDF?

Terry Crawford-Browne
06 May 2012

Terry Crawford-Browne says we're moving to the Costa-Rica option by default anyway

Text of letter from Terry Crawford-Browne to Roelf Meyer, Chairperson of the Defence Review Committee, May 4 2012

Mr Roelf Meyer, Chair

Defence Review Committee
May 4, 2012

Dear Roelf

1. As I commented yesterday, civil society representatives during the 1996-1998 Defence Review repeatedly warned that offsets are internationally notorious for corruption. We at the Coalition for Defence Alternatives pleaded with every cabinet minister not to proceed with the absurdity that R30 billion on armaments would generate R110 billion in offsets to create over 65 000 jobs.

The affordability study that went to Cabinet in August 1999 also warned the ministers that the arms deal was a reckless proposition that could lead the government into mounting fiscal, economic and financial difficulties. At public hearings into offsets held by the parliamentary Trade and Industry committee then chaired by Rob Davies, every submission by business, academics, trade unions, churches and NGOs also warned that offsets are nonsensical. Instead of paying heed to these warnings, Minister Alec Erwin told ETV television reporters after the hearings that "I and my cabinet colleagues are neither criminal nor stupid."

Instead of job creation, the affordability study warned that negative economic consequences of the arms deal would be substantial increases in unemployment. It is not coincidental that unemployment rocketed from 13% in 1994 to almost 40%. The shambles in the SANDF described in today's Mail & Guardian is another consequence (see here).

The Auditor General also warned Parliament that offsets could not be guaranteed, and reported in the JIT report that he was not permitted details of the offsets on the spurious excuse that the contracts were "commercially confidential". Archbishop Njongonkulu Ndungane called for a judicial commission of inquiry in August 1999, but was also brushed off. President Thabo Mbeki "doctored" the JIT report purportedly to exonerate the government from malpractices, and abused his official powers in unsuccessful efforts to cover up the arms deal scandal. 

So it has been a long battle to get to the Seriti Commission. The President's legal advisers simply could not refute the mountain of evidence of corruption - amongst which are 160 pages of affidavits that detail why and to whom the BAE bribes were paid, and into which bank accounts. In their last action in November 2008, the Scorpions seized 460 boxes and 4.7 million computer pages of evidence against BAE. The German frigate and submarine consortia were equally corrupt.

Three of the Seriti Commission's six terms of reference deal with offsets. The rationale for the arms deal, confirmed by Joe Modise in Parliament in March 1999 and others, was the offsets. Even the Department of Trade and Industry belatedly concedes that the offsets did not materialise, and that South Africa was conned. Quite clearly, the offsets were fraudulent and were simply instruments to pay bribes.

You'll be aware that section 217 (1) of the Constitution requires government procurements to be conducted in "accordance with a system with is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost effective." I now have a legal opinion from a prominent advocate that offsets fail to meet that requirement. The arms deal was therefore unconstitutional and illegal right from inception.

Furthermore, the remedy for fraud is cancellation of the contracts, return of the goods and recovery of the monies. The financial consequences of cancellation will therefore fall to the British and German taxpayers who guaranteed the Barclays Bank and Commerzbank loans. South Africans will hopefully receive a tangible apology worth about R70 billion, and the warships and warplanes can go back to Europe!

I attach that legal opinion by Advocate Geoff Budlender SC which, with other material, I will present to the Seriti Commission. My legal advisers and I will press for the arms deal to be cancelled as fraudulent and thus unenforceable and, if necessary, will return to the Constitutional Court.

2. Your predecessors would not listen, but I am astonished that Defence Review 2012 is equally nonsensical. It is as childish as the nonsense we sat through during 1996-1998 that submarines are the ultimate stealth weapons to protect fish, and that South Africa needed the capacity to give the Americans a bloody nose. My colleagues reckon that it fails at least 54 times to meet section 198 (1) on the constitutional principles that govern national security. I hope that you are not going to subject the country to a repeat of the arms deal scandal.

3. I reiterate my concerns regarding Denel. It is unfixable, and transferring it from Pubic Enterprises to Defence makes not one jot of difference. Worldwide, the arms industry is a highly subsidised business, and it is capital intensive and not labour intensive. The notion that Denel can be fixed to operate at a profit is plainly absurd. Besides, what country will South Africa become that makes weapons to kill people for profit?

Being subsidised, Denel also diverts public resources away from socio-economic priorities such as education and health. We already go from one arms export scandal to the next, and the NCACC is a farce. Do we want to perpetuate South Africa's reputation for selling weapons to support dictators such as Mugabe and Gaddafi, and that the dirtier the war the better we like it?

4. As required by section 198 (1), I suggest that human security, not military security, is the constitutional imperative, and that the draft document now being circulated should be scrapped. Ironically, and as confirmed by today's Mail & Guardian article, South Africa is moving towards a "Costa Rica option," albeit by default and gross mismanagement. Amongst the suggestions I make are:

a) that the Army, Air Force and Navy are all abolished, and are replaced by a respected and capable police service, a coastguard and disaster management service. South Africa presently faces the outrageous situation that the previous commissioner of police is in jail, his successor is suspended, and that his would-be successor is also under a massive cloud of corruption and murder allegations. The widespread privatised security services should be incorporated into a new police service so that they do not in future become a risk to the state.

b) that a voluntary Peace Corps is established wherein youth are trained in life and job skills so that they become employable, and thus remedy some of the disasters of our education system.

c) that land occupied by redundant military bases is redeveloped, either for low-income housing in urban areas or agriculture in rural areas.

The department of Public Works is possibly the largest landowner in South Africa, much of its land being redundant military bases. There is a desperate need for land for a variety of reasons, yet the current Minister of Public Works recently conceded that his department is bureaucratically unfixable. 

Civil society organisations and activists are acutely conscious of the socio-economic crises that we face in South Africa. We are happy to be of assistance but, after previous experiences, we will not take kindly to rubber-stamping what purports to be a consultation.

Yours sincerely

Terry Crawford-Browne

Copied to: Archbishop Thabo Makgoba

Archbishop Njongonkulu Ndungane
Archbishop Desmond Tutu
Professor Ade Adebajo, Centre For Conflict Resolution
Ceasefire Campaign
Advocate Paul Hoffman, SC

Click here to sign up to receive our free daily headline email newsletter



 

Comments

If you come across comments that are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate; contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs, please report them and they will be removed.
 
 responses to this article

SANDF and arms deal
When I read Terry C-Bs letter I hung my head in shame. Why? Because the actions of the regime in this matter is a huge blot on the good name of South Africa.

According to a report in today's Rapport the ANC are going to investigate why whites . .more

by James Bell on May 06 2012, 22:02
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Give this man a Bells
Mr Crawford- Brown, these pigs have their snouts so deep in the through that their ears are covered. They won't hear you. The only route is that which you have spelled out, but then again, they are too dumb to read.

by Wim Kotze on May 06 2012, 22:09
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Hats off to Terry Crawford-Browne!
This man, who was fobbed off as a man of straw and vexatious litigant by no other than the compromised Trevor Manuel, has steadfastly stuck to his guns to bring the scandal which is euphemistically referred to as "the Arms Deal" out into the . .more

by Mute Fool on May 07 2012, 00:53
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

down with whitey
O my GOODNESS !!!!!!- "rapport " and "Roelfie k@kpraat "Meyer" - only words I saw and all I needed to see above!!!
From my recollections up to a number of years ago when I was still stupid enough to by "news papers" - communist praisinger rapport . .more

by babbels on May 07 2012, 07:37
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

The Association
The ANC an organisation short on ethics and morality - also devoid of decent ethics and values. And look who has gravitated to the cesspool. Kortbroek. Meyer. Botha et al and many of the cream of the crop from the previous set-up. Makes one think how the . .more

by Ben on May 07 2012, 08:38
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Good Man
Keep it up Terry.
While only the minority understand your principles, your ultimate success will be a massive benefit to all. Try to stop even one of them from wriggling out, the total ANC leadership must be held responsible.

by The Clever Native on May 07 2012, 10:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Don't expect too much
Sorry, Terry, however well intentioned you are toward Roelf Meyer, his track record indicates that your courtesy and hopes are probably misplaced.
To add to the cogent points already made by James Bell, Roelf Meyer is a former Rapportreier, . .more

by Graham on May 07 2012, 10:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

@Graham :Indeed, another hendsopper if not volksverraaier.
How can we ever forget the Roelf and Cyril (or was it the Cyril and Roelf) show in which the National Party morphed into a bunch of spineless wimps more engrossed in sunset clauses and ways to save their butts than in negotiating a reasonable deal for a . .more

by Kosie on May 07 2012, 11:47
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

right but solution is naive
Terry is correct about the Arms deal. everything that he feared has proven correct. there are many people in Joburg who became instant multi-millionaires on the back of the corruption in that deal.
cancelling the deal and reclaiming the monies paid, . .more

by themba on May 07 2012, 12:09
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

SADF
I agree that the Defence Force and Police should be amalgamated into one, new, much leaner national Security Force. It is time to pension off the inefficient and useless 'cadre element', especially those fat geese that abound in the forces.

by Beaver on May 07 2012, 12:49
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

the dis-association an disengagement
why... why terry why - would you so eagerly praise and worship civil society... indeed some tangible elements of the former sandf are accommodated in the prestigous wing having earned nice lumps of pension and so... on. Obviously, i was at school on 16 . .more

by botched on May 07 2012, 14:28
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

a stone's throw away from reality
i failed to mention... a previously and current disenfranchised community.. need you perhaps a translator?

by botched on May 07 2012, 14:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Poor, poor Roelf
Roelf has always been guided by his best intentions. Without a doubt he had but the best intentions in joining the ANC. Yes, Roelf, there is absolutely no doubt that the ANC needs help. Serious help. But sadly, the ANC does not recognise it. Can not . .more

by Dinks on May 07 2012, 19:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Armies are politically dangerous
@ themba. Since Roman days it has been recognised that armies without foreign wars to fight are politically dangerous. The British and French embarked upon colonialism in Asia and Africa to keep their soldiers and sailors busy. The Americans involve . .more

by Terry Crawford-Browne on May 07 2012, 20:58
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

hungry for change perhaps?
what enlightened being existed amongst an unaligned people... or perhaps - you thought less of the children sprung from the seedsof your loins - the desires of your past and present dilemmas. find first the house at 55 balfour avenue, oh.. it is . .more

by botched on May 08 2012, 08:29
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Name
Subject
Comment