When I began working for the Democratic Alliance (DA) in 2012 in a junior role of speechwriter, Helen Zille had embarked on a great journey to reposition the DA as a ‘catch all’ party of the centre based upon broad liberal values.With Lindiwe Mazibuko’s election as parliamentary leader in 2011, it felt like that Zille’s push for greater diversity and inclusivity had been extended to not only elective representation, but also to the realm of ideas and thoughts. It was an exciting time. For this and her struggle credentials, she may be remembered as the most prestigious South African politician of our time second only to Nelson Mandela.
What was then particularly attractive about Zille’s leadership was the implicit acknowledgement that the struggle for freedom in South Africa had always been more deeply personal to black people. She also powerfully challenged notions of assumed white competence head on in the party, with the “fit for purpose” mantra including the ability to empathize and relate to voters.
From 2007 to 2013, the DA became a much more open-minded party and less tone deaf to the daily assault on the humanity of black South Africans during apartheid and the baleful consequences that persists to this day. In the party’s communications (brilliantly coordinated by the former Director of Communications, Gavin Davis), there was a greater understanding that reconciliation and redress were as important as Western-style notions of liberty, human rights, and democratic governance. The party’s former strategist, Ryan Coetzee in 2012 gave an excellent exposition on reconciliation and how it begins with seeing the world through one another’s eyes.
However, Zille was ‘a woman in a hurry’ to steal the title of a famous French-Italian movie. As she worked to fast-track dynamic black leaders, the party began to drift in its public policy formation. The takeaway must be that Zille was right to modernize the DA by working to make sure it looked and sounded like the country it aspired to govern one day.
However, she – as so many leaders do in the daily and grinding exhaustion of public office faced with countless micro decisions - stopped thinking deeply about the need for the party to develop a new economic policy to replace the outdated Mandela era consensus. Apart from education, she appeared to have scant interest in other issues like trade diplomacy, statecraft and sustainability. In fact, as a party we all - public representatives and professional staff alike - fell into the trap of defining ourselves almost solely as being the opposite of Jacob Zuma’s presidency.
For over a decade the official opposition has lacked a strategic vision of how South Africa could look under an alternative government; a theory of change with evidence-based policy making and issue trees like those used, for example, in the British Cabinet Office. Its problems are thus systemic and require a systems-based approach– one which looks at how all the components of the institution fit together. This was evident when the party formed local coalition governments in Port Elizabeth, Tshwane and Johannesburg in 2016.