Court ruling on water use rights welcomed
Johannes Möller, President of Agri SA, welcomed the ruling of Judge James Goodey on Friday in favour of the transfer of water use rights in the lawsuit between Goede Wellington Farming (Pty) Ltd and the Department of Water Affairs as well as the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs. Möller described the verdict as a notable turning point in the history of water use rights in South Africa, after this case was heard in the Gauteng North High Court on 2 August 2011.
The frustration of many commercial farmers over the last few years about the Department of Water Affairs' refusal to grant permission to transfer water rights from one irrigation site to another or from an authorised water user to another applicant compelled Agri SA to challenge the particular dispensation. An application by Goede Wellington Farming, which was dismissed by the Water Tribunal, was consequently brought before the High Court.
Since 2007, Agri SA has been unsuccessful in its endeavours - by means of numerous negotiation initiatives with the Department of Water Affairs - to reach an agreement about the implementation of section 27(1) of the National Water Act. Several applications for the transfer or water use rights were rejected merely on grounds of non-compliance with section 27(1)(b) - a regulation that refers to the need to rectify the race and gender discrimination of the past. The other considerations and terms, as prescribed in section 27(1) of the Water Act, were apparently subordinate to the regulations of article 27(1)(b).
Against this background, Agri SA welcomes the verdict in the Goede Wellington Farming case in which the judge ruled that the Department of Water Affairs and the Water Tribunal erred by enforcing the need of affirmative action in section 27(1)b of the National Water Act as a predominant factor in the review of applications for water use rights or the transfer thereof. As stipulated by section 27(1), this factor is only one of eleven factors that should be taken into consideration. The other factors include the effective and beneficial use of water in the public interest, the socio-economic impact of water use if authorised as well as the socio-economic impact of water allocation.
In the case of Goede Wellington Farming, the judge concluded that the decision of the Water Tribunal is not only dismissed, but must also be replaced by a new decision to authorise the transfer of the specified water use rights to Goede Wellington Farming. The reasons for the judge to take such an extraordinary step and also order the Water Tribunal to pay Goede Wellington Farming's legal expenses, were explained as follows: