Shaun Abrahams can announce Zuma decision

ConCourt dismisses CASAC's application for an interdict

ConCourt rules Abrahams can announce Zuma decision

Johannesburg – The Constitutional Court has on Wednesday dismissed an application by the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution to have the head of the NPA delay his announcement on whether former president Jacob Zuma should be prosecuted.

Casac filed an urgent application last week to interdict head of the NPA Shaun Abrahams from announcing whether Zuma will be prosecuted, pending a ruling in the Constitutional Court in the case.

The possible charges Zuma could face for the 2009 'Spy Tapes' saga include fraud, corruption and racketeering.

Zuma had to make representations on why charges should be dropped after a Supreme Court of Appeal ruling dismissed the former president's and NPA's applications to appeal a ruling by the North Gauteng High court in Pretoria.

NPA spokesperson Luvuyo Mfaku confirmed that the application was dismissed, but said Abrahams would not be making his announcement on Thursday.

“The Constitutional Court dismissed Casac’s application for an urgent interdict,” Mfaku said. “He’s not doing it tomorrow. It will be after tomorrow, and then we will inform the parties of his decision,” he said.

Mfaku said Abrahams would inform the parties before an announcement was made.

Casac's Lawson Naidoo has said it is disappointed in the Constitutional Court's decision.

"Well, obviously we're disappointed. It was dismissed on the grounds that the case for urgency wasn't made out clearly," he said.

In its application, Casac argued that Abrahams' decision regarding the charges would be final unless and until a court sets it aside on review.

"Even if this court finds the next day that Mr Abrahams was unlawfully appointed and must be replaced, and that he should not take a decision concerning Mr Zuma's prosecution, it will be too late."

Casac previously said, if Abrahams takes a decision on the prosecution of Zuma, "there will be reasonable perception that his decision was biased".