South Africa's black electorate seem unperturbed by the never-ending episodes of sleaze, corruption and internal dissention prevalent within the ruling ANC.
Normally, service delivery protests, weekly revelations about corrupt officials and a President whose own personal conduct has been ridiculed by the press and the chattering classes should be enough to at least turn some voters off the party responsible for these transgressions.
Instead, the ANC vote is holding firm in its traditional heartland - and is actually increasing in Kwa Zulu Natal as it sucks in more and more disaffected IFP voters. The latest spate of by-election results over the last few months clearly shows that voters are barely affected by the plethora of negative publicity the ANC is receiving. In Mpumalanga to the North-West (where by-elections have been held in the past few months) the ANC vote is as healthy as ever and has often shown signs of growing even further.
Should we therefore be surprised by this apparent impermeabiloity on the part of the black electorate to translate their dissatisfaction and frustration with the ruling party into a protest vote against it? Indeed, it would seem that the increasingly robust & vigorous internal ANC debates and the existence of a variety of high-profile personalities who often ratchet up their political rhetoric ironically enhances the ruling party's appeal to its core constituency and enables it to continue to service its broad church - albeit in a very unstable and increasingly fractious manner.
It seems as though the ANC enjoys a unique electoral advantage. It lives with and even encourages a degree of protest within its own ranks and in return it continues to receive the support of the voters. A key to this is the very effective method by which ANC officials enter any area beset by ‘service delivery' protests. The first order of business to the ANC task teak will be to shore up support for the movement - and then listen to the people's problems. The ANC has developed an outstanding mechanism for retaining loyal support even in areas most severely affected by poor municipal management, ineffective councillors and corrupt local officials.
The ANC has always suffered from internal dissention. Prior to 1994, this was kept behind closed doors as was much of the party's policy deliberations. Essentially, the key focus was the end of apartheid and nothing was allowed to get in the way of this goal. However, once issues of future economic policy became more important than the now historic and less immediate success of ending apartheid, open and vociferous internal debates were allowed to surface. Add the jockeying for power, privilege and position and mix in the desire to access state resources and contracts (and a very open and free press and electronic media) and you have a recipe for the very public display of internal bickering often used to name and shame individuals for narrow political ends.