Sexual Offences Act: NPA has neglected its duties
Evidence has emerged that shows that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has been aware of flaws in legislation regarding sexual offences as early as 2010.
The flaws in the legislation were highlighted in a recent ruling in the Western Cape High Court which held that 29 sexual offences provided for in the Sexual Offences Act may not constitute offences because of a lack of specific penalty guidelines.
The Eastern Cape Herald has reported that advocate Pieter Botha had raised this issue with the NPA in not one, but two cases in 2010. In the first case, the NPA reportedly responded by withdrawing the case. In the second, in the Mossel Bay Regional Court, the magistrate agreed with him. It is the Mossel Bay matter that was appealed against, and which led to last Friday's judgment.
This shows either gross incompetence or wilful obstruction of action against sexual offenders. Convictions since the passing of the Act in 2008 are already possibly in jeopardy, but if the NPA had acted to remedy the potential defect as soon as it came to their attention, two years of uncertain convictions could have been avoided. This amounts to an unforgivable dereliction of duty.
Last year, when we discovered at a parliamentary briefing on the NPA's Annual Report that the NPA was failing to keep statistics on sexual offences, I stated that the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Adv. Menzi Simelane, was not serious about sexual offences. This latest revelation shows that it does not appear that many in the NPA are.