Centralised risk management is still not the solution
27 June 2021
The hallmark of the South African government’s Covid-19 response has been the centralisation of risk management. It has favoured one-size-fits-all solutions to the economy, education, religion, medication, vaccinations, to a significant extent protocols at medical facilities, and more.
Tonight’s announcement of adjusted level four lockdown continues down this road, keeping government decision-making at the centre of the pandemic response. Yet, the results of centralised risk management results so far have been dismal.
For many people, level four is not enough, and they will take precautionary measures far in advance of what government instructs. For many others, level four is harmful and needlessly restrictive, such as those who desperately must put food on the table, or keep their employees employed, or wish to visit family members whom they may never see again. For many younger people, Covid-19 represents negligible risk, yet they are restricted in the same fashion as others, instead of allowing them the opportunity to be of service while those at significant risk take a step back.
Few things can put the personal safety and social and political stability in a country at such risk as removing food security from millions of people. Even as more than 11 000 Covid-19 positive cases are now being treated in hospital, with 2 000 in intensive care, 1,4 million people who had a job before lockdown last year are still without employment today.